NOC E.G.O Wielders Mafia - A 17P Role Madness (Game Thread) - MAFIA WIN

I'm currently facing the fact that there is no way my original predicted scumteam (skipper/me/Celever/Evie) is actually right given that all 3 of the viable votes seem to be in that 4
 
NightEmerald said:
See I’m currently attributing a lot of it to newbie-ness but admittedly I’m writing a LOT of it out. Is there anything that sticks out to you as particularly bad or is it just that theres not much
Click to expand...
Well a bit of both, the "not much" part strikes me because all the posting they've done in response to pressure based on one or three posts makes me wonder what the hell they were doing before that prevented them from posting more. But beyond that:

The "defending me fashionably late" thing was already mentioned by skipper iirc but it felt like a cheap bid for towncred after being sussed by a few people for doing very little, and I alluded to that while it was happening. The response to Cel's vote on them earlier felt like a pure OMGUS and poor response to what was a blatant reaction test vote. I also don't buy her interactions with fairy at all and the basis of/justification for their "reads" on her feels purely like fishing for a wagon opportunity at a time when fairy's towncred was somewhat in flux. 565 is probably the post that irks me the most. Overall I get the vibe of noobscum out of their depth and trying to come up with complex town explanations for simple scum inconsistencies
 
StupidFlandrs48 said:
Ah screw it ##vote Evie
Click to expand...
this vote feels really opportunistic to me, as if flandrs might have realised his scumbuddy celever is getting too much heat and needs to switch it to someone who is gaining momentum.
StupidFlandrs48 said:
I also object to the fixation on Evie as a way to shift the thread in another direction when the main argument is pairing with af. Low post count + new player (at least around here) make her such an easy target for scum counterwagons. I'm still not a fan of her posts re: myself and af but that's a D2 issue as far as I'm concerned.
Click to expand...
I mean you said it yourself, im an easy target for scum counterwagons and that seems to be what youre going for here

Im reading a flandrs/celever scumteam who wanted to fight early in d1 to try and not appear linked, and flandrs is trying to save his scumbuddy now after the celever wagon got too big
 
joey said:
wisteriapurple can you expand on your NE townread with anything that's not based on meta or you knowing him? Anyone else who townreads NE feel free to answer as well

At the moment of the wagons that have votes I'd be most inclined to vote NE based just on my personal reads
Click to expand...
literally as early as his first post in-thread (#130) he's posting reads
liked #135 because it expresses an intent to explain his reads instead of merely shouting them into the abyss
liked a lot of the lines of questioning he employed (see: #145, #252, #260)
honestly think the progression on celever employed makes sense
+ i liked his case on skip earlier
 
Yeah I just don’t vibe with an evie cw here either I think they’re fairly likely just LHF town and I liked a bit of their posting so far

And there’s just not really anything that makes me wanna move off of cele either I’m pretty sure he flips + I dislike both cws
 
Evie said:
this vote feels really opportunistic to me, as if flandrs might have realised his scumbuddy celever is getting too much heat and needs to switch it to someone who is gaining momentum.

I mean you said it yourself, im an easy target for scum counterwagons and that seems to be what youre going for here

Im reading a flandrs/celever scumteam who wanted to fight early in d1 to try and not appear linked, and flandrs is trying to save his scumbuddy now after the celever wagon got too big
Click to expand...
Clearly you've never seen me angry before, I don't stage that stuff. Also Celever was just piggybacking off an argument already made/voted on by wisp and CK, how do you think they figure into this per your theory? Why would scum!me take the risk of keeping my vote on scum!Cel until less than an hour before DL with almost no rumblings of a good counterwagon? Why would I still be beholden to what I said about you in 510 when most of your alignment-indicative content has come after that? Why would Cel have a completely unrelated crashout later on? Flesh this out a bit more if you're an advanced-enough player to use the tactics you claim to in 565.
 
StupidFlandrs48 said:
Clearly you've never seen me angry before, I don't stage that stuff. Also Celever was just piggybacking off an argument already made/voted on by wisp and CK, how do you think they figure into this per your theory? Why would scum!me take the risk of keeping my vote on scum!Cel until less than an hour before DL with almost no rumblings of a good counterwagon? Why would I still be beholden to what I said about you in 510 when most of your alignment-indicative content has come after that? Why would Cel have a completely unrelated crashout later on? Flesh this out a bit more if you're an advanced-enough player to use the tactics you claim to in 565.
Click to expand...
hate this post, what
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top