good point syberia. but come on, sand veil is hax.
How is that relavent to why Garchomp should be banned or not?
good point syberia. but come on, sand veil is hax.
what he said, emphasis on platinum changes. should occur straight after skymin.Anyway, my vote went towards the retesting of Garchomp. I personally never thought that its ban was warranted. It kept the offensive D/P as what it was and since its banning I've seen numerous bulky sweepers enter the fray without fear. Things like Jirachi and Suicune no longer have to fear STAB EQ from a CBer, so long as they outspeed Mamoswine. Garchomp was never difficult to counter and the changes that Platinum has brought to this game give an even greater reason for its retesting.
Im Thinking that Garchomp SHOULD be back in OU. Alot of things Counter it.
-Weavile
-Mamoswine
Anyways, Its not that Frightening, Its just like Salamence.
Lati@s has Grass Knot for Tyranitar. And the only reason I see them as Ubers is Soul Dew. They should be allowed in standard play, or at least tested when they don't have Soul Dew.
I think Manaphy should be tested. It doesn't have a movepool like Mew, yet they have the same stats. It has common weakness to Electric and Grass, it doesn't have the greatest speed to sweep with Tail Glow. The only thing keeping it in Ubers is Kyogre's Rain? That shouldn't be enough.
This argument is so flawed it's not even funny. :(i voted for the re-testing of garchomp.
tyranitar and garchomp share the same base stat total. they learn practically the same moves. and tyranitar has the larger-albeit marginal- attack stat. while it is slower by a great deal, it is bulkier. so why does garchomp get banned to ubers, and not tyranitar?
they both have 4x weaknesses to very common offensive types(ice and fight).
so lets bring garchomp back to OU.