what points are worth addressing?how about you comment on some of the points that have been brought up instead of pretending like we're still in rvs
im sorry but what? you're lynching Asek for CREATING DISCUSSION D1? hi hello why
i'm pretty sure that was an RVS vote on jalmont's part?
like it doesn't read as a serious push to me
That isn't at all why I'm lynching Asek. "Creating discussion" is overrated anyways, like who cares if you're creating discussion if you aren't saying anything meaningful about anything.
It's a very serious push. I'm always wary of someone who wants to lynch a group of users/focus on them early in the game for no particular reason. It's much better to allow the game to develop naturally especially early on.
The fascination with posting for no reason other than to pc++ is really annoying but I suppose I can't do anything to stop it. Hopefully people don't auto-associate that with being town. Or maybe people will. It'll make things easier for me I guess.
reads v.1
Walrein - rather neutral, feels a bit more personable this game then in past ones. Does sort of buddy hawkie once he starts going after him which is rather peculiar. (Also then slight buddies jalmont right afterwords, though in that case I agree with him so not really notable atm)
Hawkie - Hard scum reading off of one RVS post is really strange. But it also seems strange for a town to do. That said, I again find the admission he knows there's a town vig in this game is noteworthy (though with the randomness of him claiming to know who the town vig is, that's unbelievable so maybe just random BS).
Oh, well I guess jalmont's post wasn't RVS. That said, doesn't really change my point in that no one should have business hard scum reading someone off that one post.
except i never said i wanted them to be lynched or the focus of the lynch early
i said i thought they would be lynched early
try harder im sure theres a case you can build on me
its important today that theres no majority rule in place (only for today tho) so please throw your votes liberally
knights if you do your usual rqs im probably going to lynch you
im sorry but what? you're lynching Asek for CREATING DISCUSSION D1? hi hello why
Well this game started with a bang.
But this statement is just plain weird. Especially less than 6 hours after the game has started. Could just be cockyness, but it's rather unsettling to come to a conclusion like this so quickly.
we're lynching Jalmont then Josh the town Vigilante will shoot Blazade because they are both scum
and of course obviously i hard scumread Blazade & Jalmont
we're lynching Jalmont then Josh the town Vigilante will shoot Blazade
followed by
What part of this reads as a joke post Texas Cloverleaf because I don't see any joking around here, he makes a claim that those two players are scum and follows up with it a few posts later, instead of a joke one post and abandoning the next or something that would imply he's not serious about it. Which is why I would be inclined to take his knowledge as a nooby scumslip potentially, or in a role where he's had a chance to figure out the matrix we're on.
I mean, okay, the josh = vig part is strange, but I still don't get the sense he's joking from those posts.