NOC There's Actually a Sequel to the Matrix - Day 9 (Deadline Tuesday 10 PM EST)

here i did it for you now cut the straw man


Duskfall98 said:
Seems like if you have a complaint about balancing it would be made prior to game start, especially when you feel it's pro-scum. (Pro-scum rules are more likely to hinder than help you). The fact apricity has waited to voice this opinion gives me the vibe that he is trying to overly demonstrate how towny he is, which is a scum move.
Click to expand...
Texas Cloverleaf said:
Nvm this is worse vote duskfall98

The irony of this post which itself is overly verbose to try and demonstrate towniness is almost as ironic as me getting a ticket for warning another driver about a police speed trap by flashing my high beams and signalling a second police cruiser
Click to expand...
Duskfall98 said:
I don't really follow your logic as to how providing adequate reasoning to my suspicion makes me guilty. I prefered to lay out my line of thought so that others may follow and thereby create a discussion. I think this is a lot more effective than for example your previous post where the full reasoning is "I don't believe you" in your read against former hope.

Secondary to this if you think my post is ironic due to its similarity, then surely placing me as a scum read should also place apricity as a scum read. So Im wondering, what's your overall read on apricity?
Click to expand...
Texas Cloverleaf said:
I don't agree with your assessment of his post and I don't find his post to be alignment indicative in any form.

What's interesting to me is that you've targeted him in a manner that you yourself used in your own post; this suggests to me that you're subconsciously projecting your own biases onto him while fabricating a reason to scum read him.
Click to expand...
Duskfall98 said:
His post is inheritly alignment indictive as he admitted so himself, stating his reason for not saying it before was because of his alignment. Perhaps he is not scum which is why I have not yet passed a vote, but there is at least a solid chance that his post was a bluff.

I honestly don't see how me using a train of logic projects myself onto him. However, at least I provided a reason, however fabricated you claim it may be. Both you and apricity made your original votes without any proper reasoning at all. I would argue my reasoning is better than that.
Click to expand...
Texas Cloverleaf said:
Now your conflating correlation and causation, him not previously taking an action because of x does not specifically imply that him now taking said action is related.

And the "logical reasoning" you provide is you using the exact line of thought to attack apricity that you accuse him of doing
Click to expand...
 
Duskfall98 said:
Can everyone please stop what you are doing and immediately go to hope+1 and read this exact interaction between me and Texas there?
Click to expand...

ok so like

this is you before texas started pressuring you:

Screen Shot 2018-12-16 at 8.03.25 PM.png


and this is you after:

download (14).jpeg


ya dig?

InfernoDragon said:
Alright I need some more from Whydon before I can make any real decisions and on today’s lynch:

Vote Whydon
Click to expand...

Stage 3 commences

anyways I'm going back to writing my honours thesis I have 1500 words left and need to finish this
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top