NOC Two Mafias Mafia - Won by The Pack

You know my response is gonna be case me. So far we’ve had LS say I feel like lover’s dance and BGB say “bad consistency” which when pushed on actually meant “idk vibes”. What’ve you got
Your opening of "let's not mass claim" to soft claiming a role feels opportunistic plus the 3 pages of fluff you contributed plus you coming in fast to defend move just to move to toast doesn't sit right with me. I actually am not minding people still stuck on me as mafia because it feels a little more real to me than a mafia player who knows they have nothing and moves on to someone else. I also don't really want to vote zippy.
 
I want to get a corn dog but I don't want to miss deadline.

I've been really busy so I haven't been able to think a lot about the game. I would rather no lynch than vote someone without a chance to verify their claim. I am not voting out ipl, bgb, or tb420 today. Thanks
 
Votecount 1.09 1 hour and 20 minutes left
Lady Salamence (3): HydrogenHydreigon, pulsar512b, ZippyDoo200
ZippyDoo200 (3): Ehmcee, ImaginaryNeon, realiti
ToasterBoi420 (2): Celever, Psypsypsypsypsythe
Celever (1): JALMONT
imperfectluck (1): bluegummybear
pulsar512b (1): Lady Salamence
realiti (1): ToasterBoi420

No Vote (1): imperfectluck
 
Your opening of "let's not mass claim" to soft claiming a role feels opportunistic plus the 3 pages of fluff you contributed plus you coming in fast to defend move just to move to toast doesn't sit right with me. I actually am not minding people still stuck on me as mafia because it feels a little more real to me than a mafia player who knows they have nothing and moves on to someone else. I also don't really want to vote zippy.
Ok good thing I didn’t turn my phone off with this timing lol

I stand by not actually mass claiming and we still haven’t. Twins are claimed, vts are claimed, and pulsar claimed. Soft claiming the role was opportunistic yeah, just town-motivated opportunism.

Fluff is a part of Smogon mafia, why is mine worse than anyone else’s. I posted content before and after it (and during, a bit IIRC)

Toast is the first person I voted I’m p sure. I just sat on him all day, went Zippy then back to Toast rn. So idk who you’re alluding to me defending here

FTR the reasoning I pointed out wrt Zippy (actual scumread reasoning I reiterated now) I also pointed out when I noticed it live yesterday lol this part was not opportunism. I basically have been the first to state LS and Zippy maf, and the hardest push on Toaster maf. That since I came back the votes fell in line with my already stated perspective is irking me hard
 
Votecount 1.10 40 minutes remain.
ZippyDoo200 (3): Ehmcee, ImaginaryNeon, realiti
Lady Salamence (2): HydrogenHydreigon, pulsar512b
ToasterBoi420 (2): Celever, Psypsypsypsypsythe
Celever (1): JALMONT
imperfectluck (1): bluegummybear
pulsar512b (1): Lady Salamence
realiti (1): ToasterBoi420

No Vote (1): imperfectluck
Not Voting: ZippyDoo200
 
Reads: scientific method evidence-based votes are far more reliable than any random lynches where not a single person has gotten any actions off yet. The only "concrete" claims I saw so far were the twins, and most people saying whether they were vanilla/some power role. My "read" is that anyone who aggressively votes last minute to try and kill someone is more likely mafia as it would benefit mafia more, but that's just me. I'm sure others will disagree.
 
Reads: scientific method evidence-based votes are far more reliable than any random lynches where not a single person has gotten any actions off yet. The only "concrete" claims I saw so far were the twins, and most people saying whether they were vanilla/some power role. My "read" is that anyone who aggressively votes last minute to try and kill someone is more likely mafia as it would benefit mafia more, but that's just me. I'm sure others will disagree.
I meant more like do you think any players are town/mafia by virtue of their posting but ok
 
Back
Top