NOC 16P Role Madness Mafia (CANCELLED)

let's get some content in ig

a fairy-mixed
Keep in mind that I've only been in 1 game with town!fairy, but fwiw, entry was fine. Was against pulsar wagon, which combined into pulsar's claim (i'll get into that later) has the potential to be somewhat scum backing scum, but I doubt she'd be obvious enough to do that.
On their #1235 reads list: I don't buy neon acting all that different from their standard play, just don't see it. besides that, I can't really see anything big to criticize, as they're all about a combination of activity and past playstyle.
I read her reaction to Kazumi's reads in #1434 and i get nothing from it.
Vote on neon seems suspicious for above reasons but I'm not sure how much I should be reading into it.

ImaginaryNeon-mixed/townlean
Neon is Neon. Neon will always be Neon. Also he's rb, which I somehow missed. Tbqh, while rb is a scummier role, it could come in useful down the line. Instead of Ehmcee, I honestly think he's the best target of fullcop, but I welcome anyone who wants to give me reasons otherwise.

skippergamez-mixed/scumlean
I agree with m2h that the 'catchup post' reads as odd, namely weird inclusions like 'i have' in response to genisu saying they've never seen town won games as well as the reaction to fairy slight scumleaning them feeling kinda forced. Their reaction to flanders' slight scumreads are somewhat understandable, but I'd think that the Flanders post (374) could very easily be interpreted as someone who doesn't know how the others' metas are.
On their readlist at 639, it's the same deal as above. They seem to be aomewhat parroting consensus, but I'll give that the benefit of the doubt. My main issue with it is that of the 2 scumleans, one is flanders, who again, at that point just felt like a new player.
Them vouching pulsar towniness in 891 is weird ig but idk what to make of it
On 1203: wait nvm i think m2h referred to this one, and it's really weird. Their reactioon to bluedoom's entire 3 reads with "why do we have the same reads" barely qualifies as content, and reeks of 'how do you do fellow town?' Their reaction to pulsar posting post rolecop reveal is one of the biggest foot-in-mouth moments ive had the displeasure to read, and I feel like they're our most likely vote target.

StupidFlandrs48-mixed
Opening was ok? They started off distrustful of saber in 263, which is a eh take, and m2h in 303, which I understand more because nobody trusts the person with the most posts (see celever in the 2 noc smogmaf games ive played).
On readlist 1 at 374, not personally a fan of it, but it's fine for someone new to mafia,, won't analyze it too much as there's better readlists for that.
Their progression on JALMONT seems natural enough
Celever reactions also seem like standard blind reaction to his meta
Readlist 2 at 861 is imo not great, but consistent with their prior takes, where they seem to be putting heavy emphasis on generating content. I still don't get their reasoning for the SR on Alice.
I do not like their interactions with me/pulsar, as their reaction to having inconsistent stances on Alice being ignored as 'something to latch onto', I don't want to repeat the whole thing again so just see my post 870 and the convo before and after it.
Reaction to bluedoom taking vote off pulsar seems exaggerated, then again they didn't quite understand why not vote the cop+rolecop
pulsar vote at 1046 feels okayish,fmpov consistent with prior judgement
idk if I like their reaction to celever in 1417? but ill be rereading that again because i don't see what's changed about celever's reads for flandrs to cast that suspicion.
Reads at 1500 feel fine, not much argument there as they're basically just a compiled version of the above.
Not a fan of their last reaction to celever, on surface I can understand the distrust, but I find myself frustrated at them not giving celever a response to why he felt celever's progression was bad, just shutting down the conversation with 'thanks for the omgus' off celever's (definitely standoffish) statement of not expecting value (1581-7)



I am genuinely too slow at typing for the rest AAAAAAAAAA
 
NightEmerald said:
let's get some content in ig

a fairy-mixed
Keep in mind that I've only been in 1 game with town!fairy, but fwiw, entry was fine. Was against pulsar wagon, which combined into pulsar's claim (i'll get into that later) has the potential to be somewhat scum backing scum, but I doubt she'd be obvious enough to do that.
On their #1235 reads list: I don't buy neon acting all that different from their standard play, just don't see it. besides that, I can't really see anything big to criticize, as they're all about a combination of activity and past playstyle.
I read her reaction to Kazumi's reads in #1434 and i get nothing from it.
Vote on neon seems suspicious for above reasons but I'm not sure how much I should be reading into it.

ImaginaryNeon-mixed/townlean
Neon is Neon. Neon will always be Neon. Also he's rb, which I somehow missed. Tbqh, while rb is a scummier role, it could come in useful down the line. Instead of Ehmcee, I honestly think he's the best target of fullcop, but I welcome anyone who wants to give me reasons otherwise.

skippergamez-mixed/scumlean
I agree with m2h that the 'catchup post' reads as odd, namely weird inclusions like 'i have' in response to genisu saying they've never seen town won games as well as the reaction to fairy slight scumleaning them feeling kinda forced. Their reaction to flanders' slight scumreads are somewhat understandable, but I'd think that the Flanders post (374) could very easily be interpreted as someone who doesn't know how the others' metas are.
On their readlist at 639, it's the same deal as above. They seem to be aomewhat parroting consensus, but I'll give that the benefit of the doubt. My main issue with it is that of the 2 scumleans, one is flanders, who again, at that point just felt like a new player.
Them vouching pulsar towniness in 891 is weird ig but idk what to make of it
On 1203: wait nvm i think m2h referred to this one, and it's really weird. Their reactioon to bluedoom's entire 3 reads with "why do we have the same reads" barely qualifies as content, and reeks of 'how do you do fellow town?' Their reaction to pulsar posting post rolecop reveal is one of the biggest foot-in-mouth moments ive had the displeasure to read, and I feel like they're our most likely vote target.

StupidFlandrs48-mixed
Opening was ok? They started off distrustful of saber in 263, which is a eh take, and m2h in 303, which I understand more because nobody trusts the person with the most posts (see celever in the 2 noc smogmaf games ive played).
On readlist 1 at 374, not personally a fan of it, but it's fine for someone new to mafia,, won't analyze it too much as there's better readlists for that.
Their progression on JALMONT seems natural enough
Celever reactions also seem like standard blind reaction to his meta
Readlist 2 at 861 is imo not great, but consistent with their prior takes, where they seem to be putting heavy emphasis on generating content. I still don't get their reasoning for the SR on Alice.
I do not like their interactions with me/pulsar, as their reaction to having inconsistent stances on Alice being ignored as 'something to latch onto', I don't want to repeat the whole thing again so just see my post 870 and the convo before and after it.
Reaction to bluedoom taking vote off pulsar seems exaggerated, then again they didn't quite understand why not vote the cop+rolecop
pulsar vote at 1046 feels okayish,fmpov consistent with prior judgement
idk if I like their reaction to celever in 1417? but ill be rereading that again because i don't see what's changed about celever's reads for flandrs to cast that suspicion.
Reads at 1500 feel fine, not much argument there as they're basically just a compiled version of the above.
Not a fan of their last reaction to celever, on surface I can understand the distrust, but I find myself frustrated at them not giving celever a response to why he felt celever's progression was bad, just shutting down the conversation with 'thanks for the omgus' off celever's (definitely standoffish) statement of not expecting value (1581-7)



I am genuinely too slow at typing for the rest AAAAAAAAAA
Click to expand...
This reads like scum. Not even soft scum, just very blatant scum.

Your insistence on calling fairy/myself "mixed" when you clearly favor one side over the other for both is just laughably anti-content, if you had any sense you'd TR her and SR me to actually demonstrate an opinion (instead of just compiling facts with a slightly biased and annoyed tone).

If you still have an opinion on my treatment of Alice in my reads, how about you go get your own fucking opinion first so we can compare notes, otherwise it just looks like angleshooting for wagon targets like Pulsar to exploit (with her doing exactly that last night). You can make the "she hasn't posted enough" argument, but... actually no you can't, because you just did a 180 on Skipper and keep townreading Neon, who has only posted fluff as per what is apparently his tradition. I ISO'd you and found nothing in prior posts either, even though you've found the time to comment on others like Joey and M2H. So don't give me the "I don't have time" bullshit, I'm sure you've got stuff going on IRL but don't use it as a blanket excuse.

You're sheeping skipper and it's probably the most obvious part of this whole thing, voting for him after what happened with us last night is just a laughable turnaround. On your first readlist you called him null when he'd already made the same sus things on his first readlist, you must've seen it back then. I find it hard to believe you only had these thoughts after his second list. And even if your thoughts were triggered by that, you were still calling me out for my scumread on skipper around 10 pages later. I don't need to explain the issue with following M2H's line because you already pointed that out yourself. At 1392 you say you "don't like skipper's vibes" even though he'd barely posted anything between 861 and that besides some takes on pulsar who doesn't even matter at this stage of the day because no one's voting for her.

An hour before DL is an awfully convenient time to run out of reads after four people. If I don't see some actual reads for other active peeps I'm gonna be looking to vote you D2 at this rate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top