Recent content by Cassiopeia

They should already. If they don't, this is a bug. Edit: should be fixed now.

This already exists. Use /unfriend [username].

This is not feasible, ignore spectators is a client-side toggle. Command is infeasible for the same reason as above. In general, this is a no. There's a reason you're not allowed to ignore staff - there's a variety of moderation reasons they may need to get your attention, the simplest of...

Above post is on the nose. It'd be fun, but it's really more suited to a bot. Closing this.

This is by design not allowed in order to prevent spamming a user with information overload and conditioning them to ignore polls/announcements.

I'm going to say no to this one - given how many spambots and the like we have to clean out every day, it would just be a trivially easy way to bypass autoconfirmed requirements, which is ripe for abuse.

We have this already. Use /challenge format@@@Best Of=number.

Yeah, this is a no. We don't let regular users make rooms for a reason - we've tried that and it's come back to bite us with a vengeance every time.

Oh, this is a bug - approval isn't needed here. It should be factoring those in, I could have sworn I filtered those out from the count when I made automodchat. Go ahead and feel free to make a PR.

We have permanently banned Zephyr Moonbeam from Smogon. Please feel free to reach out to SS if you have any further questions, but we ask that further discussion of the matter is kept out of this thread.

/show is the only notable command where this occurs. Everything else that can't be broadcast or used in PMs carries a room specific function or something else of the like where it's intuitive. /show is specifically limited to prevent abuse.

Please do not claim suggestions until they are approved. This is a no because a) we are deprecating our use of Pokepaste as a third party tool and b) for abuse reasons. I’ll check on the rest with the relevant parties.

If you want to skip validation, just challenge people to the format ``Gen [num] Custom Game`. That has no validation whatsoever except for that which you place on it.

Since it's come up a couple of times, I may as well note this sums up accurately most of the issues with recruiting other users. With regards both to a reporting process in general and recruiting others to do it specifically, it should be noted that the access necessary to accurately verify a...

Chess.com can afford to act reactively to these problems and just remove people from ladders after the fact, whereas our system of usage stats as it stands right now cannot without in essence having to make things up after the fact. We'd have to throw out bot results entirely, which means...