Recent content by Leman123

Can we ban the broken things and if Gliscor/Ting-Lu dominate and suck can we just ban those too? Like there's no upper limit of number of bans we can do and I'm not sure why we have to pretend like if we ban Ogerpon-W and Kyurem that the resultant metagame will be horrible and we cannot do...

EVs: 32 HP / 252 Atk / 240 Spe Pretty sure this is 16 too many evs. Assuming the spread is 32 HP/ 236 Atk / 240 Spe

I think that the vote for Snow could have been conducted a little differently. Its a bit of a unique circumstance as the two bans are mostly mutually exclusive. I would have liked to see an initial vote on if Snow required a ban, and then a follow up vote on which of the two was the better...

why are we thinking about unbanning something stupid like palafin when the tier is still a mess? lets get rid of kyurem and ogerpon instead please

Just because it is generally only used at the beginning of the tier, doesn't mean we can't use it at other times.

Given the general consensus that something is wrong with HO in the tier, but the lack of a consensus on what should be banned would the Kokoloko method be applicable here? I'm sure nobody wants to do four months of suspect tests and arguing.

can we ban one of the many brokens instead of talking about a different random uber that has no business in this tier every week

The idea that if we ban Kyurem and Ogerpon-W and Darkrai will make Slowking-G/Gliscor cores too good doesn't super make sense to me? There are a lot of Pokemon that can take advantage of that core that are not quite as potent as Kyurem, Ogerpon-W, and Darkrai that are viable like Weavile...

Also if you can tera and switch out then Zone can't really trap anything.

What about Latios? Why did we all of a sudden decide Latios was okay?

Sorry, but this is incorrect. Historically, we ban things that are broken and ignore the positives it brings. If a ban makes something else broken, we ban the new broken thing. If a ban makes the metagame worse, then there are probably further fundamental issues with the metagame. For example...

Not wanting to ban a Pokemon because it brings positive attributes to a tier is not a good reason to not ban something. If we have to ban something else after banning Garchomp, it's okay. You're allowed to have a UUBL with more than 5 Pokemon.

can we not

This is why scales are not a good way to handle surveys, everyone interprets a 1-5 differently, meaning its much harder to interpret results and take meaningfull actions. A QB/Supsect/Do Nothing, or even labels on the 1-5 would be much more effective, so we don't need "personal metrics."...

I know we've all apparently collectively decided that Deo-S isn't problematic, but it got a higher vote than Archaludon on the last survey.