Recent content by mcandrew5629

Because the other people who voted by climbing ladder legitimately (some for the first time as a big accomplishment) wants their voice heard? Because 10-15 people who decided to use their vote for a foolish gotcha or to cheat doesn't represent the playerbase that wants fair and equitable...

I don't know if it is necessarily for everyone, but I just love how much effort was poured into character dialogue in this generation. Some of the most compelling scenes and moments of genuine hilarity. You can tell the writers had a lot of fun, especially with how the school settings = more...

Iirc Teraform Zero removes all terrain and weather

Laceys battle theme is a futuristic Unova trainer battle remix and the wild battle music in the Terarium is the Unova wild battle remix too lfg!!!

So Kurt (Kaphotics) just retweeted their old tweet from 2014: This usually happens right before a datamine so we may get some information before release after all.

It hasn't even been a month since DLC dropped and people are complaining that bans aren't happening quickly enough?

I just ran into Jacq and he gave me an egg containing Turtwig, with me choosing Spiragtito in the beginning. Do we know if we get all three starters or if we just get one with the same typing as our Paldean starter?

For the record: These two quotes are not the same thing and it's disappointing that we've gone past misunderstandings and straight into misrepresentations.

Bumping this bc people don't read.

This feels more like reckless speculation than an actual argument for a ban. Did you sample these voters for their ban reasoning? If so, can you include it in your post? If not, then I don't know how you can confidently claim that people got reqs just to sabotage a test.

Here's a thought: can we please stop grouping the <60% that voted pro action on initial suspect into the same opinions? So many people on here are blatantly speculating on how people voted like "the no action voters are actually pro action people who didnt want a ban" or "we need to make sure...

It hasn't even been two weeks since this thread came up and we're doom and glooming about not coming to a consensus? People are still posting here and on the PR thread (although sometimes people post a little too much about unrelated things) and there's still time to monitor and discuss. A...

I don't know why you ignored the post right below in the PR thread explaining why a suspect ladder is not feasible (which also by the way is also the sentiment shared by tiering staff), but that is not a call for a ban nor is it a popular sentiment. Also if you're gonna quote ABR as a "lets...

He's listening to the community feedback by listening to this thread and the PR thread, where a majority are not entertaining a ban or are unsure on which restriction to place. No one is calling for an immediate suspect. If council really didn't want to listen to its users, this thread wouldn't...

Can we please drop the discourse for a completely different metagame's suspect test, especially if you didn't even bother to meet reqs and/or vote? We shouldn't suddenly change established policy because you didn't like the result lol