Recent content by Mekkah

Probably won't be around for a proper discussion for deadline, as I said on Discord. I hope everyone gets to read back there and change their vote, but if not, ggs? I think there's more valid cases for JALMONT, AirC and Adelynn each but that's obviously from my pov. As I said there I can see why...

I'm 50% omniguard, meaning I protect someone from everything but only up to 50%. I idled n0 n1 to not interfere with beneficial town abilities, then discussed my targets with AirC. I feel like not pubclaiming the last few targets I had can potentially help me catch someone lying today, though...

vote: ItsScaryCary

the inactive virus has spread to OC as well I see

I think AirC vs Evie is still most likely 1v1, most likely town/scum because it would be absolutely crazy for AirC to go for this play if AirC was mafia and Evie was town. Either that or a massive interpretation, but he seems to be very sure. It would really reassure me if I knew what the mech...

I forgot Evie and JALMONt in the above post oops. Evie was in a couple of the mech discussions earlygame and I think that's all I've seen? JALMONT I only remember memeposting, so on the same level as zorbees for me. Actually JALMONT had a little more to it cause I remember discussing the vote...

All this said, I've spent the first couple days trying to prod for activity, but that's not what I join OC games for. So I'm hoping others will join that effort like bluedoom and Former have been doing a bit. I'm not going to be nannying inactives this game, I've got other stuff to do

Yeah if there's a (mafia) freezer then we probably need to have some thread activity to get anywhere. It gives bluedoom some towncred in my eyes but not nearly enough to just claim, I am going to ask everyone to hold off on claiming until we have like...anything more. Personally my standard for...

Any particular reason? Also are you on the Discord server? I'll join the No vote wagon for now.

Legit though we had this discussion on Discord but might as well mention it here: the gambling mechanic makes it worth reconsidering whether no vote is optimal over rand voting. I assume if someone has incriminating info they'll come forward but if that's not the case: Reasons to vote someone...

I'll join

Thinking about playing this, couple questions: So in the example, person A is hit by 50% investigatation, and then a safeguard that hits person A for 50% will reduce all non-killing abilities by half? Are you told what kind of percentages you're hit by or is it hidden? Are kills % based too?

ggwp holy what an endgame for town

ok that quote goes hard but i can't find it on google, is this from some kinda medium or did you actually write this fire?