Recent content by Pidgeot500

Can you respond to anything else I said, besides my Mr. Mime & Moltres paragraph and my edited question?

Oh, I wasn't accusing anyone of deleting posts; I mean, I always use Quick Reply, and before if I accidentally clicked a link in the middle of writing the post and then hit back my post would be there. It's just a browser thing. "I already told you I created the tier lists on my own. Nobody...

Did I change my preferences, or why do my posts always disappear so easily these days when I accidentally click a link? Hmm... "the purpose of a tiers is to group pokemon that are similar in power." Yes, if you under "power" as viability (viableness?) in standard play. And that's commonly...

http://www.smogon.com/community/showpost.php?p=135305&postcount=39 is the point I made. Although of course you may have decided that mine was not a "decent" point. "borderline pokemon can be used in standard play, but standards dominate borderline" If standards dominated borderline, why would...

A major part of this is probably because the quoting system with vB doesn't let you do quotes within quotes, so we reference something that is quoted without naming it, and then reference the reference, etc... I have to scroll up to read previous posts to understand the thread of conversation, I...

They people you asked are native RBY'ers, and active, and experienced? And they seriously agreed that Graveler and Venomoth BL? They didn't raise any objections, I mean. "borderlines do horrible in standard play." Not the definition of a borderline. Yes, this makes sense now; your definition of...

Maybe Charizard, as a kind of lesser Raichu (decent stats/speed, and varied offense, can do some damage, is what they have in common); as with Nidoking can only really do well in situations where its main counters are weakened... In any case...

here we go Oh, yes, I see... it's kind of complex how that's ordered, but, I believe I've worded this correctly. Done. I don't think it'd really be a "problem", since it's not directly or indirectly relevant to legitimate cart mechanics in any sense, though it would be an inconsistency...

"Perfect" only as far as strategically relevant information, however. This isn't really a technical document, it's meant to help introduce people to competitive RBY by explaining differences in battle mechanics. Hmm... it is true, actually, that someone who is playing over actual RBY rather than...

I added a bunch of what Kamex and Kikuichimonji said early that I guess wasn't fully implemented; notice the significantly larger "Other Differences" section. I put PP rollover in a separate section, rather than grouping it with Wrap, since it's bulky yet not especially strategically relevant...

(Edited out: fixed) I can make these changes myself tomorrow, since I'm not very busy at all, or skarm or Hip or Vineon or someone can make them and edit my post. I love the comment about the RBY charm :) Edit: (Edited out: fixed) For fun, you could also add that almost every time a technique...

Awesome game. =) Edit: Yeah, that's why you should never say "I lose" mid-match just because I finally managed to sleep your Vileplume, especially when you already had quite a "neat" lead from the very start of the game.

When skarm is through formatting and incorporating suggestions as appropriate, would the guide then be reposted here for further review? (I had assumed that it would be, since the week wasn't halfway through way back when this topic was active etc. so I thought there'd be time, but it's just one...

It isn't Lesm vs JMC for the final? Edit: I mean, did JMC lose twice? Edit: Oh wait CHaR won, so it'd be CHaR vs JMC. Edit: OK, I'm completely wrong. In any case, congratulations! =)

Probably it would be insane to care about grammar to this extent, but there's actually a difference between three- and four-period ellipses... three-period is for when an idea/statement is just briefly trailed off, such as "Don't... do that. If you press that button... this building will...