Recent content by torkonpeter

in

Username: torkonpeter Tiers Preferred (not binding): RBY ZU, RBY SU Tiers Not Played (binding) RBY Little Cup, Nintendo Cup 1997, RBY STABmons OU Time Zone: GMT+1 Foreseeable inactivity:

https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen2pu-2529490775 https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen2pu-2529496497

3 things Bp isnt suddenly only after the drops in contention last meta there was alredy an survey for bp and it was the issue seen as the most problematic of the things surveyed and mentioned as the most common issue of pu in the free write part of the survey The second thing is farfetched...

In

im still for full active tiering but am ok with every version of it so im ok with saying below this cutoff mons fall above they rise but im also ok with having c as an inbetween tier or only dropping/rising an mon if its 2/3 times in an rising/dropping tier im even ok with only dropping/rising...

the pucl drop only specfic tier was one of the proposed things and my post was mostly vs that like i said im mostly ambilivant towards the pucl using new pu if it uses the actual final pu builder we decided on and i think like you missed my second part of my message i never said wait till slam i...

maybe i should have expressed myself clearer im mostly agaihnst creating an rises only meta game speficially only for pucl i think there could be some problems if an pucl accepts the new pu but im much more ambiliviant towards that like i think an last tour for old pu and giving new pu some...

ok so im from the pu community so i should not have the last word for the discussion of nu wants to do with the builder but i am an big proponent for active tiering rises and drops so im completly for hitmon and even rhyhorn rising tiers are suprisingly addaptable so those rises most like wont...

In

In

I was early with rating gravler and now people rank it so much higher then i ever did

https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen2pu-893194

https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen2pu-892343