If I had a nickel for every time someone made a conspiracy theory about how the council is ignoring the will of the people, I would be a very rich man.
Can you stop bringing American toxicity into this with randomly calling my take a conspiracy theory? As can be seen by the results of the OU surveys, it is a fact that whoever posts the survey results only posts honourable mentions/write-in mentions by the qualified playerbase, which shows that this is the group that the OU Council looks at regarding tiering action.
Honourable mentions/write-in mentions are only collected from the qualified playerbase because the total amount of responses is insanely large: you need to remember that the data is parsed through manually for the write-ins, and thus they need to go through each individual response if they were to mention all the write-ins.
Correlating to the last survey with total response numbers, March 1st 2024, there was a ratio of around 1 qualified response for every 8 general responses. Amongst the qualified, around 75 write-ins were mentioned. Accounting for multiple write-ins from one person, we can put the statistic to be around 60% of the qualified playerbase writing in.
Now, let's apply these ratios to the past two surveys (the June 2024 survey did not have qualified numbers). The May 2025 survey had around 94 qualified responses, which would mean there was about
752 general responses, with an estimated
451 general write-ins. The January 2025 survey had around 130 qualified, meaning
1040 general responses, with an estimated
624 general write-ins. Obviously, these numbers aren't exact, as the ratios can fluctuate over time, but even if only 70% of these estimated numbers are correct, that's around 300 and 400 write-ins! The amount of time and effort to go through each one, collect the statistics, and then convert them into usable data would require so much effort, we'd be lucky to get them back two weeks after the survey!
I'm not contesting that the Council favors qualified responses: that's just logical. But to claim they're completely ignoring the general playerbase is frankly stupid. There hasn't been any noticeable case where the general playerbase has shown enough support for a suspect/ban (Pre DLC 2 survey showed a 3.76 for Kingambit compared to a 3.26 from qualified, but on that same survey Sneasler scored a 4.29 on qualified, so it was obviously targeted first), and before someone here claims that Tera Blast or Tera itself has hit these thresholds, no, they haven't, and you're vastly overestimating your support.
People here are so quick to attribute malice whenever something they don't like happens, as if the world's out to get them. Sometimes, you need to take a step back, and think it through more logically. Not everyone is opposed to you, specifically. You won't always get what you want, and that's not some deep rooted conspiracy: that's just how it is.