• Smogon Premier League is here and the team collection is now available. Support your team!

RBY World Cup IV Eligibility Discussion Thread

phoopes

I did it again
is a Member of Senior Staffis a Top Community Contributoris a Site Content Manager Alumnusis a Metagame Resource Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Simulator Moderator Alumnus
Social Forums Head
Hi everyone I just want to start off by saying that no matter what happens with this inevitably some of you won't be happy with the decision(s) made but I'm going to do my best to mitigate that, hence the creation of this thread. (also shoutout to Amaranth who is NOT the host so DONT bother him but he's been very helpful to me already with hosting so thank you to him).

Let's cut to the chase: every year for World Cup there are people that want to sign up but have a hard time finding the numbers to play for their own countries. This means they get "stuck" playing for conglomerate teams like Rest of the World. In an ideal world, everyone gets to play for their own country but in reality this just doesn't work. So we have to make adjustments, including making conglomerate teams. However, team Rest of the World doesn't feel as good as more regional teams, so...

Here are some of the concerns that have already been brought to my attention/other possibilities that I've thought of even though signups have only been up for like four hours (lol), along with my personal opinions on them.

Team Spain + Portugal:
To be blunt, this combo team existing is not consistent with other eligibility rulings that have been made over the years. From what I understand it was formed because neither country had enough signups to field a whole team by themselves and they wanted to join forces so it was allowed. I don't think this was done out of malice in order to form a team that can compete for the title, but everyone knows that Spain + Portugal combined is a very good team, which is probably why people complain about it (in addition to it being inconsistent with other eligibility rulings).

My gut reaction is that our Spanish and Portuguese friends should split up, and just bolster recruiting efforts in order to fill out their rosters. If neither country truly can field a roster, MAYBE they can stick together. However, a different solution could be that they become a part of a bigger conglomerate team that is more consistent with eligibility rulings like Oceania. This would keep them together which would probably make them happy, and be more fair with other geographic rulings. More on this in the following sentences though.

European Conglomerate Teams:
A proposal that I've heard that I think kind of makes sense is instead of having a "Rest of the World" team, that we probably have enough European players without country teams to form "Team Northern Europe" and "Team Southern Europe." So like for example, if you're from Sweden you play for Northern Europe, if you're from Greece, you play for Southern Europe. As said before, I think that this is more consistent with other geographic teams like Team Asia or Team Oceania, and prevents people from being like "well I'm not actually from the country but I speak x language and live in an adjacent country so I should get to play for them." There's so many cases of this and enough European players that I think two general European teams (one Northern, one Southern) would be fair in this scenario.

France, Germany, Italy, and UK all have the signups, so they stay separate of course. If necessary, Spain/Portugal get lumped in with team Southern Europe (though as I said, I would prefer these teams to recruit and be their own country teams). I think this is a pretty good solution.

United States Teams:
Last year, we had team Northeast and Team Rest of US. Similar to the Spain/Portugal situation, I think that if the other three regions (Midwest, South, West) REALLY try, they can probably recruit enough people so that we can once again have four US teams. If that's not possible, I will grumble about it but we can do Team ROUS again. I know ROUS was cool last year and they made the finals but really it would be better to split things regionally IMO.

Team Latin America:
There's been interest expressed in forming Team Latin America this year. Yay! I think we can all agree that this is better than having a team Rest of the World if team LatAm is able to form. I'm sure I'm going to sound like a broken record, but having individual teams like Brazil and Argentina that we've had before would be ideal, and then from there we can get others from Latin American countries to form team LatAm.

Team Asia/Indian Players:
Team Asia intends to form this year. Yay! No issues there. China obviously remains separate because they're most likely going to get enough players to form their own country team. From what I assume, Team Asia will probably grab players from India. I think it would be cool and doable if India had its own team though, similar to how Brazil and Argentina have had teams in the past. Try and do your best to recruit, etc. So I would encourage Indian players to band together and form their own team, but if not, you should have Team Asia to go to.

African Players:
Having a Team Africa like we do Team Oceania would be sick. This one is tough though because from what I understand, even if we give Africa a whole continent team they might still have a tough time getting the numbers for a team. With all of the above pointing to an elimination of team Rest of World... do we think it's fair/good to have the conglomerate team be "Team Southern Europe/Africa"? I feel like there's no real elegant solution to this problem so I'm all ears.

---

With all that said, I think this is how I would LIKE to split things up. This is not the final decision obviously, which is why this is a discussion thread, but here's the proposal.

Individual Country Teams:
Argentina (if possible)
Brazil (if possible)
Canada
China
France
Germany
India (if possible)
Italy
Mexico
Portugal (if possible)
Spain (if possible)
United Kingdom
US Northeast
US Midwest (if possible)
US South (if possible)
US West (if possible)
USSR

Conglomerate Teams:
Asia (includes India if necessary)
Northern Europe
Southern Europe + Africa (includes Spain/Portugal if necessary)
Latin America (includes Argentina and Brazil if necessary)
Oceania

Teams that could form depending on how this discussion thread shakes out:
Rest of US (includes any combination of Midwest, South, West if they're unable to form)
Rest of World (includes Northern Europe, Southern Europe, Africa if they're unable to form)

---

Okay thank you for your time and happy discussing. And keep recruiting and signing up. Hell yeah we love World Cup.
 
if spain + portugal is allowed to combine then i don't see a reason why france and belgium can't combine too? personally i'm not a fan of combining regions in general but IF WE'RE GOING THERE then regions that have very close ties should be allowed to go together

i also think USSR should just turn into eastern europe. it's a less politically charged name (i know its impossible to avoid politics in a World Cup but still) and it lets the team include more countries
 
if spain + portugal is allowed to combine then i don't see a reason why france and belgium can't combine too? personally i'm not a fan of combining regions in general but IF WE'RE GOING THERE then regions that have very close ties should be allowed to go together
the very obvious reason is that france has enough people to stand on their own, so they do, because this is the simple and obvious way that world cups function

portugal+spain is an extreme aberration where neither team (seemingly) can find enough people by themselves, so they have to go to a regional grouping of some kind regardless. normally this would be europe, but having 'europe' be only portuguese and spanish players would be stupid, so we have allowed portugal+spain as a regional grouping (call it "europe southwest", to make an US parallel) while the rest of EU also can and is encouraged to make their own team
 
The reason teams would combine isn't because they couldn't find enough players, it's because the RBY mainers didn't want to have non-RBY players starting for their team. It's not motivating to play for a team that doesn't have much of a chance to win versus combining and fielding a competitive lineup. There's not enough time to teach new players how to play RBY, and it's tedious for managers to explain everything. US South and US West could've fielded individual teams last year if they really wanted to but they would probably struggle to make the playoffs versus combining and making it to finals.
 
Last edited:
Hi everyone I just want to start off by saying that no matter what happens with this inevitably some of you won't be happy with the decision(s) made but I'm going to do my best to mitigate that, hence the creation of this thread. (also shoutout to Amaranth who is NOT the host so DONT bother him but he's been very helpful to me already with hosting so thank you to him).

Let's cut to the chase: every year for World Cup there are people that want to sign up but have a hard time finding the numbers to play for their own countries. This means they get "stuck" playing for conglomerate teams like Rest of the World. In an ideal world, everyone gets to play for their own country but in reality this just doesn't work. So we have to make adjustments, including making conglomerate teams. However, team Rest of the World doesn't feel as good as more regional teams, so...

Here are some of the concerns that have already been brought to my attention/other possibilities that I've thought of even though signups have only been up for like four hours (lol), along with my personal opinions on them.

Team Spain + Portugal:
To be blunt, this combo team existing is not consistent with other eligibility rulings that have been made over the years. From what I understand it was formed because neither country had enough signups to field a whole team by themselves and they wanted to join forces so it was allowed. I don't think this was done out of malice in order to form a team that can compete for the title, but everyone knows that Spain + Portugal combined is a very good team, which is probably why people complain about it (in addition to it being inconsistent with other eligibility rulings).

My gut reaction is that our Spanish and Portuguese friends should split up, and just bolster recruiting efforts in order to fill out their rosters. If neither country truly can field a roster, MAYBE they can stick together. However, a different solution could be that they become a part of a bigger conglomerate team that is more consistent with eligibility rulings like Oceania. This would keep them together which would probably make them happy, and be more fair with other geographic rulings. More on this in the following sentences though.

European Conglomerate Teams:
A proposal that I've heard that I think kind of makes sense is instead of having a "Rest of the World" team, that we probably have enough European players without country teams to form "Team Northern Europe" and "Team Southern Europe." So like for example, if you're from Sweden you play for Northern Europe, if you're from Greece, you play for Southern Europe. As said before, I think that this is more consistent with other geographic teams like Team Asia or Team Oceania, and prevents people from being like "well I'm not actually from the country but I speak x language and live in an adjacent country so I should get to play for them." There's so many cases of this and enough European players that I think two general European teams (one Northern, one Southern) would be fair in this scenario.

France, Germany, Italy, and UK all have the signups, so they stay separate of course. If necessary, Spain/Portugal get lumped in with team Southern Europe (though as I said, I would prefer these teams to recruit and be their own country teams). I think this is a pretty good solution.

United States Teams:
Last year, we had team Northeast and Team Rest of US. Similar to the Spain/Portugal situation, I think that if the other three regions (Midwest, South, West) REALLY try, they can probably recruit enough people so that we can once again have four US teams. If that's not possible, I will grumble about it but we can do Team ROUS again. I know ROUS was cool last year and they made the finals but really it would be better to split things regionally IMO.

Team Latin America:
There's been interest expressed in forming Team Latin America this year. Yay! I think we can all agree that this is better than having a team Rest of the World if team LatAm is able to form. I'm sure I'm going to sound like a broken record, but having individual teams like Brazil and Argentina that we've had before would be ideal, and then from there we can get others from Latin American countries to form team LatAm.

Team Asia/Indian Players:
Team Asia intends to form this year. Yay! No issues there. China obviously remains separate because they're most likely going to get enough players to form their own country team. From what I assume, Team Asia will probably grab players from India. I think it would be cool and doable if India had its own team though, similar to how Brazil and Argentina have had teams in the past. Try and do your best to recruit, etc. So I would encourage Indian players to band together and form their own team, but if not, you should have Team Asia to go to.

African Players:
Having a Team Africa like we do Team Oceania would be sick. This one is tough though because from what I understand, even if we give Africa a whole continent team they might still have a tough time getting the numbers for a team. With all of the above pointing to an elimination of team Rest of World... do we think it's fair/good to have the conglomerate team be "Team Southern Europe/Africa"? I feel like there's no real elegant solution to this problem so I'm all ears.

---

With all that said, I think this is how I would LIKE to split things up. This is not the final decision obviously, which is why this is a discussion thread, but here's the proposal.

Individual Country Teams:
Argentina (if possible)
Brazil (if possible)
Canada
China
France
Germany
India (if possible)
Italy
Mexico
Portugal (if possible)
Spain (if possible)
United Kingdom
US Northeast
US Midwest (if possible)
US South (if possible)
US West (if possible)
USSR

Conglomerate Teams:
Asia (includes India if necessary)
Northern Europe
Southern Europe + Africa (includes Spain/Portugal if necessary)
Latin America (includes Argentina and Brazil if necessary)
Oceania

Teams that could form depending on how this discussion thread shakes out:
Rest of US (includes any combination of Midwest, South, West if they're unable to form)
Rest of World (includes Northern Europe, Southern Europe, Africa if they're unable to form)

---

Okay thank you for your time and happy discussing. And keep recruiting and signing up. Hell yeah we love World Cup.
It's not like that I did't try my best to form Team India tbh I was doing it from december and I even find 3 to 4 player ( Including me ) beacuse I wanted player who know about RBY how play not to be the very best But I felt that even If I made the team In the starter only it will have very less power and for the sub the Players I have decided they were not even willing to play games onec so what will be the point to form Team India It is not like I don't want to form I tried my best to do it But it was not working ven f I did put some more work it will form at min requirement But tbh will there be any point of this if in team 4 to 5 player are not willing to play that's why I decided that I will form Team Asia with july And that some good player we have in RBY give power to Team Asia And I hope next year we can form team India
 
Quick tought about X + Y country
The way you call teams don't matter in practice, most Pt and Be players have the double nationality (can also be applied to Nl+Be). It is less about France Or Spain and more about (South) Belgium and Portugal (Galicia). Fr & Sp may have enough players sure, but Be and Pt oftentimes don't, the moment they can't form a team they look for their second nationality. You can call Spain, well Spain and still have it filled with Pt players (should no Pt team be in the tour ofc). The original idea of X+Y isn't to make stronger teams, its to share credits between 2 nations
If the goal was to make "pure" teams (it sounds horrible isn't it) why do we still have a second eligibility option?
 
Last edited:
First of all I believe RBYWC should respond to the wants and needs of RBY community and just loosely follow official WCOP guidelines. Second I think one of the main needs is fielding competitive teams whenever possible. If some teams want to field a rookie lineup in order to have country representation then let them though.

I believe the Portugal + Spain case should be interpreted not as two countries merging but as a geographic/cultural region being acknowledged. There are many such cases both IRL and on the Internet where geographically adjacent countries form shared cultures and it makes sense to give them recognition. Maybe Latin America is the most obvious example. Culture is not an entirely subjective thing as it entails the formation of communities (people with similar ethos interacting regularly).

Tl;dr:
- mergers should be allowed as long as they make sense culturally, bolster competitiveness and are desired by the RBY community users involved
 
1773147211380.png

1773147265211.png

I did bro
 
"Raised in Marseille". He was literally raised in France. Smogon World Cups work by IP which is similar to that ethos. If you currently live in France or have played for France in the past and have since moved, you play for France. If you live in Belgium and have no French IP, you do not get to play for France because you share nothing in common with France other than proximity. Sucks for some people but we don't bend the rules for individuals "we" like because that's such a rough slippery slope into it no longer even being a World Cup, because where do we draw the line, at some point may as well call California US South at that point. World Cup isn't for everyone and it wasn't designed for everyone, not much more to say.
 
Zidane would be eligible for Team France in RBYWC, stop ragebaiting
This isnt ragebaiting tho, this is one of the many instances who shows that your previous message is wrong: many pros hold double/triple nationalities and still are able to choose for which national team they want to play, even if their first nationality still have a team. Belgium/Portugal don't even ask such a luxury here, they ask to be able to play for a team that represent them the most if their actual country of residence cannot form a competitive team and not be "thrown" in "Europe" or "Rest of the World"
Again, merging countries making for stronger teams is a consequence, not the main cause. A good consequence id say: if you stick to the "pure" team ruling: USA must merge, no arbitrary splicing, thats a lot of players not in the tournament/benching, thats also 3 less competent teams in the tournament, its a net positive as it is. On the other hand not allowing smaller countries to merge with a close neighbor leave very capable players (if not outright top3 players in the world...) out of the tournament. Europe/Estern Europe is another elephant in the room when it comes to "only national based teams" its just never gonna be mentionned as an issue as long as it dosentconsistently make playoff/win the whole so why would we handpick which countries are allowed to merge or not? Please let people call their national team representing 2 countries however they want to, as long as eligibility is good (which is based on trust anyway) it dosent change the squad at all, just throw a punch in the gut of smaller nations that had to merge for representation
 
Last edited:
I would like to just say that acting like splitting the us is arbitrary is insane. All 4 reguons have massive cultutal differences to one another. And they are well defined regions. Its not like theyre just split for the sake of more people playing. These reguons are the sizes of entire countries dude.
 
I'd prefer for the grouping of "Rest of the World" to be removed with whatever availability and teams that form from that instead being added to the rest of the closest available regions.

It would most likely become a bit of a mess but I'd say teams like Team Germany/ Europe having a player or two from from Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland or Estonia isn't something that bad for the sake of ensuring they end up on teams more likely to qualify on center stage.

I'm not discounting the complexity of players where the borders get objectively blurry ("Why is an Albanian playing for team Italy?") but condensing team sizes would create a more reasonable playing field for those stuck in countries where the player amount is sorely lacking.

Another caveat of complexity does get introduced for people in under-represented countries not being likely to be brought into their respective regions (for the sake of the argument, Dane trying to play for team Germany) but I'd say this gets met with this being a responsibility as a manager for those regions to give new players a shot or not.
 
Last edited:
I would like to just say that acting like splitting the us is arbitrary is insane. All 4 reguons have massive cultutal differences to one another. And they are well defined regions. Its not like theyre just split for the sake of more people playing. These reguons are the sizes of entire countries dude.
Point was that as it stands the way we split/merge RBY national teams is arbitrary (sorry wasn't clear), , Rest of Europe, Rest of the US, Oceania, South Europe (with Italy as a standalone in the middle of the geographic region) is fine to our rules but Iberia isnt. I don't see the logic beside "yea lets nerf Iberia" which i mean fair you want the pool to remain as competitive as possible but did Iberia stomped the competition last year? They didnt even reached finals. Seems perfectly fine to allow the fusion, make some from a geographical, cultural, competitive standpoint. The argument is about this tour being about actual user communities and not IP/id cards.
 
They fully make sense, but the decision to allow or deny fusions based on " theorical strengh" remains arbitrary. Ties are similar (if not closer, iberia and Fr+Be got more in common than Rest Of [insert continent]) but some are allowed while others aren't
 
They fully make sense, but the decision to allow or deny fusions based on " theorical strengh" remains arbitrary. Ties are similar (if not closer, iberia and Fr+Be got more in common than Rest Of [insert continent]) but some are allowed while others aren't
good thing absolutely none of the decisions are based on "theoretical strength" then
 
good thing you take more than 2 minutes to answer all the points made with a non heated answer. Beside that, previous editions shows that Iberia or Fr+Be are not overpowered relative to the field, the only fusion that reached finals is Rest of US, which is allowed in, and it is perfectly fine, don't want to let all these players on the side. But this whole "fusions aren't allowed because it make overpowed teams" seems to only apply to small european playerbases because you; despite not being involved much in respective communities, said they would have enough players to fill a roster if they really wanted to" like come on, make a list of current active Pt/Be players, doubt you reach a starting 6. Only option for them is to play for Europe, even Spain and France may struggle to reach 6-8 avaiable players this year. I guess they go play for Europe aswell. No system is perfect but surely the handpicking one have more issues than others
 
It shouldn't, at least proven otherwise, which is not the case. And yet its the main (only?) argument that you have against european fusions. You litterally managed a "fusion" when UK didnt had enough players btw.
1773176464081.png
 
It shouldn't, at least proven otherwise, which is not the case. And yet its the main (only?) argument that you have against european fusions. You litterally managed a "fusion" when UK didnt had enough players btw.
View attachment 815192
My main point is that it's antithetical to the point of a World Cup, Fusion teams are last resort options only to allow players who truly have no hope of playing otherwise to play. Usually they do not do terribly well for a variety of reasons, but it doesn't feel particularly good for real nations when they do succeed, e.g. Rest of US making finals. I think they shouldn't have existed and I hope they don't form again. That one is particularly agregious as those teams could have formed (but I agree that is not every team, just an apple that I don't think tastes very nice on the tree).

World Cup is to play for your nation, there are countless other spaces for players to play outside of it if they can't (RBYPL, RBY OU Summer Team Tour, RBY Ladder Tour is on right now, RBY Invitational Playins, ROAPL, CNPL, ADPL, the list goes on) and if they can't, they form continental teams because that makes sense. Team Europe is understandable, team Germany + Sweden or France + Belgium make absolutely 0 sense, it's just tacking teams together for no reason other than Player A wants to play for France rather than team Europe, despite Euripe certainly being able to form.

Also, as I mentioned in my previous post. If we don't have rigid rules on this, we create a slippery slope that we will fall down. One day a player from Belgium wants to play for France, we say yes to that. Then the next day someone from Russia / Mongolia wants to play for China, and who are we to deny that, because we said yes to Belgium + France. and then after that someone from Netherlands wants to play for Italy, and on it goes until at some point we aren't even playing RBY World Cup, we are just playing RBY Kind of Loosely Connected but Not Really Collection of Nations.

And on your point about my team personally. Firstly, the British Isles are frankly very seperate from everything else, politically (it's unavoidable in a World Cup tour), geographically, and culturally too. Second, this was in an effort to seperate from Europe, it was the first time UK had formed, and it only formed because I pushed hard for it. We needed to make some compromises or we would have just been pushed in with sad Europe, which I had distain for the UK being a part of as it doesn't give us room to celebrate and be prideful of our own culture (this is not to bash on team Europe, I just want my country to be prideful in it's own strength when I know it has the strength to do so). Third, It was basically just team UK anyways, there was only 1 player from Ireland in it, and we needed that one player to make up a suitable starter base, the cultural and geographical ties Britain has with Ireland just fit neatly with our need (there is a history of teams with particularly poor sign up quality being outright denied formation despite having the number of signup, e.g. India in World Cup 2023). Once our nation got on its own two feet, we were able to make it solely UK, and frankly I'm much happier for it.
 
Last edited:
First point: ROUS deserved their spot il the final, they had a good roster but by no means it was overpowered, lets not use their good performance to make a point here. Also making a judgement call mostly based on ones team performance seems so wrong, theres so much more when it comes to judge if a national representation feels good or bad. "oh they win too much it dosen't make sense" vs "they don't have much in common but they don't really perform so we're not bothered"

Second and third point: Germany + Sweden make as much sense as Portugal + Spain + Greece (or south europe if you will). If you want a rigid rule, fine but apply it to its fullest. No fusion at all. Terrible for the tournament but hey at least the rule is applied and everyone is on an even ground regarding what they are allowed to do with their rosters, double standards where you handpick who is allowed to fusion/split and who isn't is the opposite of a rigid rule. WC is about promoting users communities, which oftentimes comes from national circuits yes but not exclusively as not every nations have one (Leru played for Germany despite not being German for instance but he have the eligibility so its all good and well, Belgians plays on the french circuit very regularly: it creates ties)

Last Point... Do you realise that if Iberia /BeFr wants to fusion for the EXACT same reasons you pushed for UK+Ireland 2 years ago?.... Dosen't Iberia feels separated from the rest of Europe aswell. You litterally call Europe "Sad Europe" and yet you wanna push for its inclusion in the tour when its roster don't concern UK anymore? Nah this is too much to handle LMAO. Looks at the active RBY playerbase at this very moment, Portugal and Belgium needs more just 1 player to be able to make a full roster. Even France needs more than 1 rn. It isnt much of a concern for BeFr as all the Belgians also have french eligibility, the only difference for us is that you want us to be called France instead of Belgium + France, idk how this could ever be good for Belgium to potentially comes with their own roster in future editions if the country isnt even mentionned in the team name. Just a slap to the belgians here. For Iberia its much more dire as double eligibility is less common here (and yet this is more acceptable than Belgium + France according to Amaranth) but worst part is that you are probably leaving out half of both Spain and Portugal roster out simply because their motivation to represent something called Europe (or Sad Europe, your terms, not mine) isn't as engaging as representing their locals.
 
Please don’t choose combos until at least one week of signups is done. If the question is something like “should Spain + Portugal be a team?” The answer is maybe. Nobody is going to know until more signups come in. No regional/group team should be formed or grandfathered beforehand, none should be automatically assumed as will move forward, and simultaneously all combinations should potentially be on the table as necessary depending on signups so that all players have a team they can reasonably be eligible to play on.
 
"fusions aren't allowed because it make overpowed teams" seems to only apply to small european playerbases
you are literally making this up brother. nobody is saying this, it is not the reason behind any decision, you keep typing 100000 words but you should read my 1 sentence in reply every time because it dismantles everything that you are saying. you do not understand the reality of how teams are decided in this tournament
 
Back
Top