PK Gaming
Reaction score
2,115

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hey PK Gaming, you said that alexwolf's thread was going to also cover the Choice Specs set, but again this is happening; it is covering only one set. So again I ask; wouldn't be better if both sets were covered in one analysis?
    Lol yeah that makes alot of sense i figure I'd take initiative since no one started it.
    And it's ok I don't take offense to being bad. I haven't played in ages and can't even break Top 100 on the ladder and no tourney experience so yeah that's definitely alot worse than a council member. :p
    Hey!
    I saw your "UU viability ranking thread" and I think that it's a really cool idea! I was curious if I could borrow your format in that thread, but for the OU forum. I've taken a big break from Pokemon so I thought it would be a good exercise to see what is and isn't effective in the metagame.
    Thanks!
    But then the revised Choice Specs set will not be covered, or it can be covered on a future thread that Alexwolf could possibly open?
    I didn't understand why you changed the thread title. Is because you want that thread to only cover the Choice Specs set? I think that now that the skeleton of things like overview was made, shouldn't be better to wait until Alexwolf post its bulky set so that the QC can approve / reprove all that at once?
    PK Gaming, lavos isn't working on Lapras anymore, so may you close the thread? Thanks, as usual ;)
    I think John's about to go kick Typheus' ass.

    Please let this be the case. Shit's about to get real.
    *sigh*
    One more amcheck until I PM Jellicent. My post in the Meloetta analysis seemed to go down well, so I hope my second one does too. e~e
    RT: also i think chandelure looks good now
    [10:55pm] kokoloko: ace_emerald
    [10:55pm] kokoloko: you're good to go
    [10:56pm] Ace_Emerald: sweet
    [10:56pm] kokoloko: (let pk know he's off the hook)

    Thanks anyway though!
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top