Search results for query: *

Forum name: ABR Cycle 1 Alt: LT121GU ABR Does my alt for this Cycle contain my forum name or a very similar variation/abbreviation of it as required by the rules?: yes

discussion of complex bans aside (either for or against), the roarbp combo on zap jolt vap, even without statpassing, are combined more real and worth preserving than agilipass zap. i can sympathize w wanting to ban jask or watev but banning the roarbp combo is definitely not it in terms of...

won ggs https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen2ou-858386 https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen2ou-858397?p2 https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen2ou-858400?p2

won ggs

won ggs https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen4ou-857946 https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen4ou-857953 https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen4ou-857972

^ and i don't even know about all these limitations, we could follow common sense to a degree... but spectating + the stours lobby environment was way more hype with looser rules on chatting (and really, very very very minimal benefit was gained by players looking) edit: i think the above is...

in

activity, no wall response

in

2 great players, looking forward to watching it and good luck both :heart:

dpp cup, gmt-4, we can schedule on discord @abreeezy if that's easier

in

Won vs HSK7, gg https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen6ou-852214?p2

in

in

i think persian is viable but it is harder to use now, laxes r more often dropped or booming, gar is very common, zap matchups r unfavorable... it's main building niche to me is as an extremely favorable matchup vs rhydon teams (and cloydon included if it bolts as mentioned above^). i also...

Cutoff after A- :tauros: i would only really consider not using it on full wrap but even then it fits on many wrap teams :snorlax: mainly droppable to fit rhydon and some other niche things, but easier to drop than tauros 100%, i also still hate boomless sets :exeggutor: where the somewhat...

I don't think 2500 would suddenly become 3000 or something like that, I think it would just be slightly easier to maintain 2500 instead of almost guaranteed losing it in a day. Particularly within ladder tournaments it can be very frustrating to have people decay daily when they play daily...

I admittedly am not sure how much the average person plays, 48 is an improvement but 72 feels preferable overall. The glicko reasoning for not dipping below 6 is fair. Is reducing the amount of elo deducted on the table? And thank you for the response.