Search results for query: *

that's what you get for posting a shitty argument; an effortless counterargument.

Like we all said, read other comments about the 195827576265 calculations all made. -We're forced to use Sableye, Klefki. Over-centralizing. -Second point is basically same as your first point. -Ferrothorn cannot do fucking jackshit to MKang. Nothing. -Gliscor and Skarmory cannot hope to wall...

Because Mega Luke can clearly stay in, defeat every single thing until Mega Kang comes out. no. please.

The fact that the five other members can at least throw some shit at the opponent's team, weakening MKang's checks and counters is clearly valuable. And how is this even debatable? I infer this as sending MKang against a full team of 6. Does this sound reasonable to you?

Who the fuck uses an Eviolite Gligar?

You're trying to say that Mega Lucario can survive a +2 attack from MKang right? +2 252+ Atk Mega Kangaskhan Power-Up Punch vs. 0 HP / 0 Def Mega Lucario: 208-246 (74 - 87.5%) -- guaranteed 2HKO +2 252+ Atk Mega Kangaskhan Return vs. 0 HP / 0 Def Mega Lucario: 198-233 (70.4 - 82.9%) --...

There's also another 5 fucking members backing up this 4 Moveslots Syndrome monster.

Hey! I know you're looking for an interesting Safari. I have a Grumpig, Sigilyph and Xatu safari(which I think you don't find it interesting or you'd probably have it anyway) but I was wondering if you're still up to add me?

Will there be a significant power loss if using Jolly instead of Adamant?

Is there even a need to further discuss this? All we are doing right now is refuting that Arcanine can tank this thing when it really, really, really can't unless you factor in shit like Burns. EDIT: Np, hope you learnt something new :)

Stopped reading at the switching in just 1-2 times. MKang switches whenever the fuck he feels like and no decent player will let a KANG stay in on something it cannot outspeed or take on.

I don't think you get what we're trying to say. You're insisting that MKang isn't broken and we merely refute your argument. Maybe the get out part was a little harsh, but if you wanna play a game the way it is designed then maybe competitive battling might not be for you.

Your argument is flawed. I can say the same for Garchomp previously. Don't tell me there is no way to deal with it. Checks and everything. But it was still banned. And like you said, you ran a whole lot of defensive Pokes. If I'm running a defensive core and only ONE out of the core can deal...

Not an expert but it's not all that difficult to even get +2 on him. Once he gets +2, almost nothing gets to switch into Return, survive it and proceed to KO him or whittle him down. Teams are almost forced to carry a counter and even one isn't enough sometimes because after all, there are 6...

I have my reasons for not playing Pre-Pokebank. Mainly because there's not much point in playing a metagame that'll cease to exist in a few weeks time. Talonflame is pretty frail, even with priority Roost. I prefer the recoiless Quick Attack and will definitely miss it. But thanks for the rate...

Hey, thanks! I will definitely try both variation of Exca out. Although I'm here wondering will the abundance of physical attackers in my team do me more harm than good? I haven't done any testing but on paper it seems to me that Gliscor can come in and wall pretty much anything.

He already has a Mega so Lefties on Scizor.