Search results for query: *

I would use the paraflinch analogy, but that's been "debunked" many times in the thread already, and people are confident that it's "not as bad" as swagplay.

So the swagplay user's moveset is taunt, swagger, foul play, and most likely sub to not get themselves confused. Well, Reuniclus does get Night Shade, which will eat through the swagplay user regardless of subs. So it does force the switch. I don't see how that's a waste of time at all. More...

I'm talking more about the Reuniclus calcs. So on the switch, foul play will do very little, and barely enough to break a sub. It seems like it can be enough of a check with recover as well. What's the defense that Reuniclus isn't enough of a check?

So how exactly does the prankster/swagger abuser work around magic bounce? They paralyze/confuse themselves, then the magic bouncer gets a free turn if they switch.