Search results for query: *

Which means it's ok for the same mon to get retested again and again ad nauseam if it didn't get banned but it's not ok if it's a retest to bring it down from Ubers for a mon with a very close vote like Aegislash. I see.

You actually proved my point since those two were made Ubers.

Every time a suspect test pops up I automatically asume the mon in question will be banned and a lot of the community does so. What is even the point of a suspect test other than announce a month before that X mon is getting banned lol

Why has no one brought this up yet?

Which old posts did I bring up?

Why is the Tank set the first mentioned when it's not even close to being one of Aegislash's best sets? Swamp-EDIT: I don't want to see any more of these "Why is the X set the first mentioned when it's not even close to being one of Y's best sets?" posts. They don't contribute much of anything...

This message regards the public chatroom "Lobby". Now Lobby is a group of highly active members, but this thing is, is that Lobby has become a place for trolls and spammers to plan many attacks. I can assure you, half the percentage of them have been banned temporarily due to various spam...

Doesn't it mean that they aren't "the best OU players" anymore because they can't manage to defeat BP? Magic Bounce Espeon existed since BW. People already whined about it since the start of the season but it never got banned because the metagame stabilized and ways of beating BP were found...

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever read. Confusion is an inherent mechanic of the game and implementing a confusion clause would be as retarded as implementing a "critical hit" clause. Pro bans are only posting the same 2 replays in where they wreck a sub 1200 ranking guy with a...