Search results for query: *

  1. Metagame SS OU Metagame Discussion (Usage stats in post #944)

    I think this is a completely valid adjustment, but the reason we don't see the adjustment is also the reason it makes no sense talk about banning Moody: G/D-maxing is the main concern and breaking the parity of both players having access to it is on the forefront of everyone's mind. I go into...
  2. Metagame SS OU Metagame Discussion (Usage stats in post #944)

    Not trying to say this isn't valid, but I will say it certainly isn't enough information, especially second-hand. I saw the set and it looks nice, but there is a way to play with G/D-maxing involve and a way without, which is why I say I'm not opposed to a Moody suspect, but only after the...
  3. Metagame SS OU Metagame Discussion (Usage stats in post #944)

    I hope you can see how that's not how I took it, but apologies if I mis-attributed your argument. I disagree with this, but as having not done any testing with and/or against Moody Glalie, you're welcome to take my opinion with a grain of salt. Now, because of that, I would normally not...
  4. Metagame SS OU Metagame Discussion (Usage stats in post #944)

    I hate this logic. "Fun" has no business determining (which I will differentiate from influencing) the legality of pokemon/abilities/moves/etc. You're reacting in an emotional manner and lashing out, I get it. However, in this situation the question we should be asking isn't "is this fun,"...
  5. Metagame SS OU Metagame Discussion (Usage stats in post #944)

    So I'll preface my comment with I don't have time to play tons of Showdown (I'm a new dad!), but I've been following along with what's going on, watching others, as well as taking some experience with other competitive games into account to lay out my premise: Neither side is convincing, please...
Back
Top