Search results for query: *

Why isn't battle stadium singles regulation C ladder available yet on pokemon showdown?

I want to circle back to voting requirements for future suspect tests (and I say this as someone who was not disappointed with the outcome). Any proposal (such as mine) is as arbitrary as the 80% GXE that was used. I acknowledge the most votes in history, etc. 351 people qualified. But...

Considering the tight margin, I think the no action outcome was partially boosted by the way the voting/options were set up. Had I qualified to vote, my preference would have been team preview > no action >> full ban >> stab only >>>> one tera (I might not have continued playing the tier...

Full disclosure: I am someone who probably cannot get the 80% GXE. My preference would be team reveal > no action > full ban and hope the other two aren't the outcome. Since this is not how the voting works, I would first vote No Action. If you are like me where two or three of the...

What goes into the community choice offerings each month? I would have liked to see Ubers offered among the Gen 4 voting choices, as Ubers is not in January rotation and not on cool down.

It is disingenuous to claim the suspect process is democratic if only three digits worth of players will get the reqs when at least four digits worth play and care about this. A ban here means that in less than two months the signature feature of Gen 9 is gone. I think tera deserves longer...

This is far from a democratic/community process. At the time of my post, 5 of the top 10 players on the ladder leader board, including the highest ranked player, are under 80% GXE. And below top 20, most are under 80%. If you like tera and get the recs, vote no action. Fight the tyranny...

An ideal solution would be two ladders, an OU with tera unchanged, and another OU with tera nerfed or banned.