Search results for query: *

Do not make the wrong assumption that introducing item clause decentralises the meta-game. The focus merely shift away to another item meta-game. I have yet to see anyone make good arguments about why item clause causes decentralisation.

No, subjective arguments are in this case not decent due to the fact that doesn't represent the average of users of the meta-game. Now, the argument itself is good, he himself is saying he'd like it, nothing wrong with that. But the opinion of 1 person holds no value in a significantly large...

I don't think people are really bothered, more so they question the diversity by introducing this clause. In your argument, you point out it gives more pokes a chance and that's true. But that doesn't invoke more diversity because you do not add those options to the previous meta-game, but...

Forgive me if im wrong on this one but aren't clauses in general added for 2 reasons and 2 reasons alone: 1. unbalanced. Tier list is a clear example. We ban things to uber because its unbalanced for use in regular games. 2. Uncompetitive. Evasion clause is an example, among others. It makes...

This is ridiculous, half of the arguments dont make sense, or are ignored if they do. First of all, there is nothing wrong with randomness in a game, because it makes a game more interesting. However, that doesn't mean that a game should revolve around randomness, pokemon is not a casino. The...

While dragon-typed pokes are strong, 3 on a team seems a bit too much, and none of the other teammembers seem to block these weaknesses. Almost any water type wrecks this team; Starmie beats all dragon-types and vaporeon 1 vs 1 and neither metagross and scizor enjoy eating a life-orb boosted...