A "critical ratio" for proposal #3

[Cathy]

In the other thread both proposals other than the status quo have a dependence on an arbitrary "critical ratio" somewhere over 50%+1.

Given that we adopt proposal #3 ("Two simple majorities in a row in the same stage to consider a pokemon uber "), which critical ratio should we adopt to allow a second round of testing to be skipped for a suspect?

The idea of the poll is that you check off all critical ratios with which you would actually be satisfied with being used as the critical ratio. If you support anywhere from 60% to 80% as the critical ratio, you would check off everything in that interval.

There is no option for a simple majority because this poll is operating under the assumption that we adopt aldaron and Hipmonlee's modified proposal #3.

 

[Cathy]

This is the proposal we're going forward with but we need to decide on a critical ratio.

 

[Aldaron]

For speed I would recommend removing an arbitrary number of options (like everything including and past 75% + 1) and then only allowing people to choose 1 option from the remaining 4.

Another option would be to allow people to choose however many they want from the remaining 4, cut out the lower 2 and then have a "final" poll with 2 choices and only being able to choose 1.

 

[Cathy]

I agree with the second idea. After we let this poll run for "a while", we can put the top two options in another poll.