You really think you can do things day one?turn this into a fucking diss track of people who insist you can do things on d1
People like you: they’re no fun
Better watch out, you should be on the run
I’ll vote you out, yeah you’ll be all done
Bars
You really think you can do things day one?turn this into a fucking diss track of people who insist you can do things on d1
People filling up the thread, grouching bout no-posting towniesYou really think you can do things day one?
People like you: they’re no fun
Better watch out, you should be on the run
I’ll vote you out, yeah you’ll be all done
Bars
You're policy voting des because she's bad at the game or whathi I'm policy voting sorry, not likely to move on D1
skimmed the thread, will probably have thought (singular) formed soon
Doing a reread… Alright so this whole thing screams to me, grasping at straws to find a reason to vote someone.With the general consensus of the NOC veterans being "shut the fuck up LN" though, I'm a bit curious by DBD's decision to sheep me because I would actually put him in high esteem as a NOC veteran. So he should know that apparently No Voting on day 1 is a stupid decision (forgive my ignorance in the matter of no voting vs. voting, i don't play NOC)
My vibes say it's DBD wanting to placate my ego because he thinks doing so will make me less suspicious of him.
So for the moment, I'm in favor of voting Dead By Daylight at least until he comes around to make a defense.
Frankly, unless you plan on being significantly more active than you were in the last game i saw you in, this does feel like the pot calling the kettle black.hi I'm policy voting sorry, not likely to move on D1
skimmed the thread, will probably have thought (singular) formed soon
Why do you think LonelyNess would have a nuanced opinion of DBD's strength as a player? For someone who never plays NOC, you're just going to assume anyone who plays NOC regularly knows what they're doing. It also seems clear to me that DBD tries hard and cares about improvement, which is like... all you can really expect of someone? idk. This seems totally reasonable to meDoing a reread… Alright so this whole thing screams to me, grasping at straws to find a reason to vote someone.
DbD plays NOC but I wouldn’t call him someone with “high esteem” (no disrespect) and I know LN wouldn’t think this of him either.
Additionally, he’s now saying this is the only reason he is voting DBD (cuz he wants to no vote) when the reality is I already parked a vote on DBD — so he’s trying to find logic to build a wagon. LN is feeling very sus to me:
unvote
vote LonelyNess
Why do you think LonelyNess would have a nuanced opinion of DBD's strength as a player? For someone who never plays NOC, you're just going to assume anyone who plays NOC regularly knows what they're doing. It also seems clear to me that DBD tries hard and cares about improvement, which is like... all you can really expect of someone? idk. This seems totally reasonable to me
Like I'm really trying but I really don't see what's so bad with idling night kill. Mafia can't hit a power role, it doesn't make LYLO happen earlier, it just reduces the odds of town misvoting next round or increase the odds of getting a lucky track for town. Maybe I'm like completely missing the point somehow but I don't see how some people can consider no vote and then ignore the fact that mafia can do the same. No vote just seems really shitty in that situationAirC thinking mafia will idle the nightkill is honestly "why don't we just give up pardner" tier reasoning. Seems way too scummy to be scum lol. I appreciate the irony of that comparison followed by that comment.
1. mafia nking makes us lose our docLike I'm really trying but I really don't see what's so bad with idling night kill. Mafia can't hit a power role, it doesn't make LYLO happen earlier, it just reduces the odds of town misvoting next round or increase the odds of getting a lucky track for town. Maybe I'm like completely missing the point somehow but I don't see how some people can consider no vote and then ignore the fact that mafia can do the same. No vote just seems really shitty in that situation
Please explain both of those things like I'm a stupid 10 yo1. mafia nking makes us lose our doc
2. no vote->no nk->no vote->… is winning for town
I will grant that mafia have less incentive to NK than they normally do in this setup. But they still win the game by NKing. They are never going to hit scum so the only downside to it is the possibility of getting tracked, which is at its lowest N1. Like, you would never no vote if you were 100% guaranteed to hit scum; why would scum no kill when they are 100% guaranteed to hit town? (obv doc can block but that still isn't hitting scum)Like I'm really trying but I really don't see what's so bad with idling night kill. Mafia can't hit a power role, it doesn't make LYLO happen earlier, it just reduces the odds of town misvoting next round or increase the odds of getting a lucky track for town. Maybe I'm like completely missing the point somehow but I don't see how some people can consider no vote and then ignore the fact that mafia can do the same. No vote just seems really shitty in that situation
Yeah I mean I see your point but I feel like mafia would rather play D1 again than get a NK. The way I see it (assuming a perfect game from mafia (only missvotes/protector always miss) :I will grant that mafia have less incentive to NK than they normally do in this setup. But they still win the game by NKing. They are never going to hit scum so the only downside to it is the possibility of getting tracked, which is at its lowest N1. Like, you would never no vote if you were 100% guaranteed to hit scum; why would scum no kill when they are 100% guaranteed to hit town? (obv doc can block but that still isn't hitting scum)
Stall is peaklol that the mafia game on a pokemon forum ends up being solved down to a pp stall scenario, btw
we have 5 misvotes atm, if we hit a successful doc we gain an extra one. if we NV and mafia NKs, we still have 5 misvotes but if we hit a successful doc we still only have 5Please explain both of those things like I'm a stupid 10 yo
i feel like no kill from scum just lets us eternally use our rules and ultimately town takes adv (due to 'if they receive a role they can use it but they as a whole can only pass each action to an ally once per game' from rules)AirC’s kinda right that if we no vote I think it’s optimal for scum to no kill which is why a stalemate rule should exist (but they all kinda suck, they benefit either town or mafia a lot there’s no neutral stalemate rule)
Don’t get it twisted that that means no voting is optimal for town to do though, it still isn’t lol