its conf not ecat based on vote counts
-
Smogon Premier League is here and the team collection is now available. Support your team!
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
NOC Everchanging Mafia - Game thread - Day 5!
- Thread starter Alice Kazumi
- Start date
Catching up!
(As of Page 32 anyway, like I said I’m catching up)
Yup this was my train of thought essentially. Though DBD has been quiet today so far :(
(As of Page 32 anyway, like I said I’m catching up)
Through Page 33
Maybe you all clear this up in the next few but it was my understanding that you are forced to use your action unless you are two things. If ECat was mayor and only mayor (seems likely), and now is mayor again because it was passed off to someone who was nightkilled, it goes back to ECat. But you can’t use the same action twice in a row if I’m not mistaken? Making a second mayor in a row completely useless? So I think it ECat votes today they can still be mayor and have it not show up in vote count.
Again, only through page 33 so it’s possible this was already worked out, just wanted to say that in case it wasnt
Maybe you all clear this up in the next few but it was my understanding that you are forced to use your action unless you are two things. If ECat was mayor and only mayor (seems likely), and now is mayor again because it was passed off to someone who was nightkilled, it goes back to ECat. But you can’t use the same action twice in a row if I’m not mistaken? Making a second mayor in a row completely useless? So I think it ECat votes today they can still be mayor and have it not show up in vote count.
Again, only through page 33 so it’s possible this was already worked out, just wanted to say that in case it wasnt
Yes, if their teammate was tracker they could've given their role to ECat and done the funny thing to basically lock us out of 2 roles
- genisu needs to chill the fuck out
- I dont think its unreasonable to think that ecat just checked out of the game after getting hard flamed d1 and funneled by a player with a very hostile tone all of d2. I guess I could see the logic that if you're hard committed to not voting there's no reason to claim mayor since town has nothing to play around
- cel sring fishy for voting peum and having ecat as his top scum read is very funny considering cel is not currently voting ecat either, but I do agree that fishy is probably just noon scum at this point? Certainly a player that needs to go before endgame regardless
- fishy ecat being paired makes sense if ecst happens to flip scum but I think everyone else pushing back on ecat is kind of nai. Everyone has created a game state where we can't really progressed until this is solved, though.
- I have trust issues about the cel peum mind meld after last game
I'm going to vote fishy. I dont want to hammer but also want proof available to everyone that im not mayor today
##VOTE: Vishy Fishy
- I dont think its unreasonable to think that ecat just checked out of the game after getting hard flamed d1 and funneled by a player with a very hostile tone all of d2. I guess I could see the logic that if you're hard committed to not voting there's no reason to claim mayor since town has nothing to play around
- cel sring fishy for voting peum and having ecat as his top scum read is very funny considering cel is not currently voting ecat either, but I do agree that fishy is probably just noon scum at this point? Certainly a player that needs to go before endgame regardless
- fishy ecat being paired makes sense if ecst happens to flip scum but I think everyone else pushing back on ecat is kind of nai. Everyone has created a game state where we can't really progressed until this is solved, though.
- I have trust issues about the cel peum mind meld after last game
I'm going to vote fishy. I dont want to hammer but also want proof available to everyone that im not mayor today
##VOTE: Vishy Fishy
i lied nvm its still likely ecat
defending someone from an attack by attacking the attacker
if person 1 says person 2 is scum, and in response person 3 says person 1 is scum as a defense of person 2, then person 3 is chainsaw defending
typically its a scummy manoeuvre
im working under the interpretation of the rules that even though the vote was not used d1, ecat still used mayor, and so can't use it again today
Alright caught up.
Just so I’m clear here, we know ECat was the mayor yesterday. Super duper confirmed. There’s still a possibility ECat is mayor today though, just that it wouldn’t show up in vote count because you can’t use an action two nights in a row.
ECat claims to have passed the mayor to DBD. I would like to see a Dead by Daylight vote to confirm this.
I think if this holds true and DBD is mayor we should really consider the wagon to someone else instead of ECat. Of course if DBD’s vote only counts as one then it’s a lie and we have more reason to vote ECat so that’s what I’d do.
But yeah most likely waiting to vote until DBD votes and we get a VC
Just so I’m clear here, we know ECat was the mayor yesterday. Super duper confirmed. There’s still a possibility ECat is mayor today though, just that it wouldn’t show up in vote count because you can’t use an action two nights in a row.
ECat claims to have passed the mayor to DBD. I would like to see a Dead by Daylight vote to confirm this.
I think if this holds true and DBD is mayor we should really consider the wagon to someone else instead of ECat. Of course if DBD’s vote only counts as one then it’s a lie and we have more reason to vote ECat so that’s what I’d do.
But yeah most likely waiting to vote until DBD votes and we get a VC
Yup that’s what I think too. But as mentioned in my post above I’d like to hear from DBD (like at all) and also see a vote from him
oh did he already say who he passed the mayor role to? I might be blind
yeah i missed it too but it is true, easily findable if you look up ecats posts on dbd
I mean, we have another 20something hours, so we'll hopefully get something from dbd during that time.
hopefully yeah, town fucked over by inactivity once again
I assume the opposite would be true because ECat never activated the ability, but I don't know. We can ask that question if we want to.
To be honest I have no idea as of now because if ecat is town then that's not good but like I said I'm confused
Hi Des