This thread will be moderated to keep discussion focused.
Initiated by Dogfish, pretty much everyone agrees that the description "fit the same category" is vague and needs clarification. What we disagree on is how to clarify it. So far there are some suggestions:Grudge NDA description said:The user prepares a curse. If they are KOed during that round Grudge is in effect, the curse is enacted. All Moves that fit the same category (e.g. Damaging Dark Moves, Status Moves if KO'd by a burn or toxic damage, etc.) that was used to KO the user of Grudge will not be usable for the rest of the match, even if the Grudge-afflicted Pokemon is switched out.
- Substitution Classes (Damaging Evasive moves, Poison Inducing Moves, etc.)
- Typing (Fairy, Fire, etc.)
Progress of the discussion will be tracked in the OP.Here is a better idea: Talk about the Grudge the move in relation to the issue brought up, not how many Pokémon get Grudge / how many times Grudge is used. Nobody cares about usage and it has never been a good argument to use to justify something anywhere.
If I see a bunch of consecutive posts on a similar scale to the Grudge usage / distribution again... Well let me just say that I will not be pleased.
That is all.
Fire away ^_^