• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

Lets talkt about competitive battling....

Status
Not open for further replies.
I posted this in this section because I do not think it should correlate to Pokemon in general.

-------------
Pokemon is a game like any other game. You can never be the best. You can be great. If you're great, it only means you win more than an average battler. Why? statistically you're considered to be "clever and experienced at the game." Which means that you have a lot of experience in the game and understand how things works and you are intelligent. Intelligence in correspondence to IQ. If you have a high IQ you are able to configure statistics in your head while making smart moves. Such as outpredicting someone's prediction, eliminating Pokemons in order to gain the higher statistics in winning the battle. To clearly understand this, for example; all your Pokemons are being countered and you clearly observe your opponents team through scouting. You come to a realization that in order to maximize your chance of winning you must sacrifice one of your Pokemon through exploding a significant Pokemon the opponent needs to stall you. So you exploade that Pokemon and you Heatran takes an ease and eliminates half the opponents team. Thus, maximizing your chances of winning. But if you fail to explode at the right time, that means your opponent has outsmarted you and has "more experience and intelligence." Then there is "luck." When you are luck haxed, your chances of winning can severely detiorate or not change much at all. An example is a siginificant critical hit in which it elminated an important counter for the opponent. Thus, deteriorating your chances of winning and having a tougher time countering the Pokemon that took out your main counter. This usually ends in a loss.

So to be good at the game you will need the two main components, Experience and High IQ.

So many, they have a high IQ, but not experienced. They know how to predict and make outstanding moves in game, but lack experience in knowing certain elements of the game.

Others have a long time experience. So they understand how to counter and sweep effectively and win. But they lose because of being outpredicted through the other players "IQ" in understanding how you will make your moves. They know this because once they've studied your moves for a few turns, they can predict your level of intelligence and understand every move you will make. (This is only clear to those that have high experience and IQ).

Then there's luck. Luck by statistic is relevant to all players. If you played 1000 stright games and counted how many times you've had luck oppose to how many times your opponent had luck they'd come outvery close to 50%. (I can certainly guarantee it). So it is utterly wrong to say "you have the worst luck than anyone in the game." Because statistically all players have the same amount of luck (meaning not one person has 30% Hypnosis rate and the other has 90%, its always 60%).

This is to prove that, like all STRATEGY games, you need experience and a high IQ to defeat those lesser than you. Also, luck plays a huge role. (in order to prevent luck, statistcally you'll have to do a best our of 101 games in order to find the best battler).

Experience = Can be obtained to anyone
High IQ = Only a select few
Luck hax = Can be obtained by both battlers
Luck in having the right team = Can only happen to one of the battlers

-----
If you disagree, please state why. If you agree and understood what I'm trying to explain, then you realize how the game works an intelligent person
 
You assume "High IQ + Experience" means you can be good at this game. This isn't particularly true - you don't need a high IQ to perform well within the game. In fact, let's not use IQ - it's a poor measure of what you're looking for. By "Intelligent people" you mean "People who can make good choices while managing the imperfect information" so I would change that wording.

Pokemon is a problem of managing probabilities based on given information. This is why

But if you fail to explode at the right time, that means your opponent has outsmarted you and has "more experience and intelligence."
is definitely false in many cases - as many people try to "outpredict" - which ends up being coinflips anyway. The thing about Pokemon is that you are taking risks one way or another - your opponent has more than "hax" to get lucky. You can't say experience matters everytime - as different people will react to different experiences differently. In many cases people overpredicting (whatever that means) isn't an IQ issue - particularly because after a given point "i will know you know i know you know i know this" ad infinitum - to the point it's literally just luck at that point.

Being outsmarted does not imply more experience and "intelligence" - it can easily mean "luck" since in the end, you are managing probabilities - that "he might do this" might bite you any time.

Other than that, this thread doesn't really measure "competitive battling" but rather "who can be good at Pokemon"
 
If you played 1000 stright games and counted how many times you've had luck oppose to how many times your opponent had luck they'd come outvery close to 50%.
While this is certainly true, counting the amount of times that luck mattered in every match is different. I'm sure that, while luck exists, it often doesn't matter. What I mean is that it often doesn't make an opponent win when he should have lost and vice-versa.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top