Although trusted users are the only ones who can make group chats, there are remnants of mechanics that were made as countermeasures to abuse from non-trusted users. I'm mainly looking at "Hosts."
I'm thinking that the host feature has become largely unnecessary now that trusted users are the only users allowed to make group chats. The restrictions to hosts has made growing a group chat annoying, and undermines the feature.
I'm proposing that, just like subroom group chats (which don't utilise the host feature, I'm assuming for the reason that only public room drivers can create them in their respective rooms), that the creator of a subroom group chat be granted the room owner rank.
I'm thinking that the host feature has become largely unnecessary now that trusted users are the only users allowed to make group chats. The restrictions to hosts has made growing a group chat annoying, and undermines the feature.
I'm proposing that, just like subroom group chats (which don't utilise the host feature, I'm assuming for the reason that only public room drivers can create them in their respective rooms), that the creator of a subroom group chat be granted the room owner rank.
