So... does this mean Action Replays are illegal or... ?

mattj

blatant Nintendo fanboy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privilege_escalation#Jailbreaking
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/10/dmca-exemptions-rejected/
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2411465,00.asp
http://www.ps3news.com/playstation-...cts-exemption-rules-jailbreaking-ps3-illegal/

Recently, the Library of Congress and the Copyright Office (do those offices seriously have any authority what) changed a few rules and confirmed a few others concerning the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. Apparently they re-look-over the rules every 3 years.

This time around they (seemingly arbitrarily) decided that jailbreaking phones shall be legal, but jailbreaking tablets shall not (wut?).

They also heard some testimony about jailbreaking videogame consoles and decided that we shouldn't be able to jailbreak them either. Why? Because you can run pirated games on them. Nevermind the plethora of pirated games people play on their phones, nor the legitimate, otherwise legal ways homebrewers and the like use jailbroken(?) game consoles (RNG research springs to mind).

Now, as far as I understand this discussion, Action Replays don't qualify as "jailbreaking", but anyone can feel free to correct me there. But honestly, who knows? If it's illegal to download a program that changes your game console's OS, why wouldn't it be illegal to stick a black, plastic, little thingy in your DS that allows you to do pretty much the same thing? Not exactly the same thing, but it looks pretty close to the layman.

Now, I for one understand these companies' and organizations' need to protect their work. I don't emulate games. Well... not regularly. When B/W came out I got a flashcart and slapped a JPN copy of Black on it so that I had some place to store my mons I RNG'd on my legit JPN White until ENG White came out (SHAME!). I haven't used it since. But obviously I can see how they would lose money if people hack their consoles and download all their games for free.

But is that reason enough to outlaw jailbreaking? What about legitimate uses, or where this could go next?

It seems kind of like outlawing all guns because we have a real, honest murder problem. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater. That kind of thing.

Thoughts?

[edit]

The title is a joke. This is a discussion about whether or not jailbreaking your console should be illegal or not, and why.
 
Still trying to find the difference between opening up my prebuilt computer and changing the insides and opening up a tablet or console and changing up the insides.
 
because one is a computer and the other is a still a computer silly

Oh it makes so much more sense now.

Also for the point of this thread yeah obv ARs aren't jailbreaking since in the end all you change are stored values, nothing really in the main coding itself.
 
When jap B/W2 came out a couple friends and I called nintendo support and told them some guy on "smogon.com" sold us a fake rom of white 2 for $49.99. They were pleased with our help, and began looking into the case.

anyways to relate to your thread. the us copyright thing says

…proponents had established that the prohibition is adversely affecting and likely to continue to have an adverse impact on, certain use of mobile devices in which the firmware, a copyrightable work, is protected by technological measures. The evidence in the record indicated that smartphones have been widely adopted and that consumer acceptance of such devices will continue to increase in the future…

so apparently once tablets are used more jailbreaking will be legal. lol
 
Action Replays have always skirted legal lines as far as things such as Copyrights are concerned but nobody has taken legal action against them yet. I mean really, look at the art on one of these:
61688-forside.jpg
Nice fake Hippopotas and Giratina etcetera
 
Back
Top