VGC VIABILITY RANKING
SERIES 05
Welcome to the VGC Series 5 Viability Ranking project, where we rank the viability of Pokemon in VGC Series 5. With Player’s Cup II well underway, this metagame is still very much alive. The floor will always be open to discussion, and after a period of time (roughly every two weeks), the viability rankings council will vote on any of the Pokemon being discussed and post the results and reasoning here. A Pokemon moving from UR to Ranked must receive a consensus "yes" or a very convincing argument in order to be Ranked. The rankings and tier descriptions have been assigned to describe each Pokemon's state within the metagame, and the Pokemon in each tier are listed in alphabetical order.SERIES 05



When making a nomination for a shift in the VR, many things can improve the quality of your post and thus the likelihood of it convincing the VR council. Calcs, reasons why the current metagame is different for the Pokemon, replays, and discussion on how the Pokemon interacts with other relevant Pokemon are all potentially solid inclusions. Additionally, you may want to discuss usage stats as part of your argument, but don't base your entire argument on the usage of a Pokemon - usage and viability are not the same thing.
>>VR Council<<
These users have the ultimate say on shifts in Viability Rankings tiers. The council consists of experienced players who have different styles and perspectives to offer to the table when deciding the strength of any individual Pokemon.








>>S Tier<<
Pokemon that dominate a large portion of the metagame. They are either quite powerful or offer great team support, and can fit on almost any team. You can't really go wrong by using these Pokemon.
S




S-


>>A Tier<<
Pokemon that are generally strong and can easily be placed on a variety of teams, but don't have the same level of prowess as the threats in S tier. These pokemon are extremely important within the current metagame.
A+





A




A-










>>B Tier<<
Pokemon that are fairly strong in the current metagame. Pokemon in this tier offer offensive, defensive, or supportive capabilities to a considerable amount of team compositions, or have a notable impact on the meta.
B+







B









B-













>>C Tier<<
Pokemon that are generally strong, but less powerful than those in B Tier or Pokemon that require a decent amount of support or a specific team style to function well, but are defining pieces to said archetypes.These Pokemon do not have much impact on the metagame.
C+












C










C-

















>>D tier<<
This tier contains either Pokemon that have broad applications on a variety of teams, but are simply less effective than those in higher tiers, or are only particularly useful for certain team styles. These Pokemon typically have very little impact on the metagame.

















>>E tier<<
-None Currently. This will serve as the blacklist.
Rules for posting:
- Post intelligently. Posts like "I think pokemon X should be in this tier" will not be tolerated. Expand on your opinion with actual analysis showing understanding of the metagame and perhaps bringing a unique perspective to the conversation.
- Absolutely no flaming, personal attacks, or general idiocy will be tolerated.
- Usage statistics may be used to support an argument or a claim, but don't base your ENTIRE argument around them. There needs to be more substance than just this. For example, you can't just say "Pokemon X shouldn't be this tier because they aren't used that often!"
- When nominating a Pokemon to move from one rank to another, do not merely list its obvious qualities such as stats, typing, movepool, etc. If you think a Pokemon deserves to rise or drop, explain what has changed in the meta to cause such Pokemon to get better or worse. I can assure you that the VR Council already knows the obvious qualities and we are far more interested in understanding why you believe it has increased or decreased in viability.
Last edited: