For galbia vs Mambo, although Mambo was the only one to inform me of any contact, no clear case for an activity win was made.
For giara vs Omfuga, I felt the main theme was a lack of a cooperation to get the battle done.
For During Summer vs Smurf., there was no clarification of time(zone) in Week 5 and little cooperation in week 6.
Unfortunately for Thunder with Sapientia vs Hikari, although as Sapientia pointed out, it was an activity win by the deadline for Hikari in Week 5, the deadline was extended into Week 6, to allow Infernapes and Thunder to reach a fairer conclusion. That didn't happen and Hikari didn't wish to play in Week 6, possibly protecting a due activity win and therefore effective team lead.
Infernapes were possibly protecting their own lead too, but I could not see anything clear enough in the individual match decisions to determine necessary activity wins for Thunder over the period of weeks 5&6, even taking into account that Week 5 is weighted more strongly.
So well it may be the case Thunder did rank 2nd had the qualifying stages ended in week 5, I do not regret the possibililty of the teams being swapped due to the extension, because I was hopeful more matches would actually get played (4 others did). With the teams being so close in individual wins, the lead can easily swing to one team or the other by the decisions I make regarding activity and commitment. I didn't feel in this scenario that there was a way to satisfy all parties. I decided to end at week 6, however harsh the conclusion was for 2nd place, to not keep the finals and Pacifidlog Typhloons waiting too long.
