There's daggers in men's smiles, or Jegus <SNIP> Sam Lemme Post
Ok, so I'm back from the depths of AP, and I will take my damn time making a post that I find adequate.
Just going to deal with the Ditto issue first (this is post 10, Yeti), in I think he's decent lynch target due to the suicide trait (not helpful to anyone) but not the best lynch target. I would still prefer a lynch on some of the other individuals, like Brammi (How do you not think about a persuader when someone literally posted on hour before you post to respond to a later post, claiming persuaded?), or Leethoof (Mr. Let's repeat arguments from pages ago, shall we?). Herr Call tried to 'call' me out on active lurking, when, aside from this hour or so I've spent trying to make this post, I haven't seen the thread since Wednesday, so I'm skeptical about him.
I'm not quite sure what to think about Quagsires, as while on one hand his argument's extremely frail, on the other hand I believe that there are far scummier targets, such as my aforementioned ones. The fact that there appears to be a push to lynch him is also concerning.
I believe I was supposed to provide some opinions on zorbees, yeti, and aska, as well, so that's next. I believe Zorbees is town sided by gut, and I don't really take offense to the prodding from him. Yeti is shaping up to be one of those players I can't really get read on, in that I THINK she's town-sided based on some of her contributions, but I'm not confident on it. As for aska, I can understand his sentiment of wanting to extract information from Quags, but I honestly believe that he isn't the best lynch today. In other words, I think aska's a bit misguided.
Now onto a quote response.
I am also going to call out Snike, who only posted and contributed while there were serious lynch votes on him then, after they were removed, immediately stopped contributing.
I immediately note the
intimidating use of bold and italics in tandem, and react accordingly. Believe me, Sam, I am
trembling in my fictitious baby seal-skinned galoshes. That being said, I think you may be blowing my inactivity out of proportion, so I'd ask that you not say 'immediately stopped contributing' when I did post a bit 50 posts more or less after the last serious threat on my life occurred. I do acknowledge that my activity yesterday was nonexistent, and apologize for struggling under a new semester of secondary education.
The last thing that I'd like to note is that I'm skeptical of billymills and B_T for trying to provide some cover for Brammi. It doesn't come across as buddying, but I am not really getting a good vibe for it. This might be tunnel-speak, however.