|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 264
Rock Tunnel
|
Probably should've posted it earlier. Still, I got a good deal of testing done yesterday so I sort of kinda know what I'm typing. This is my first analysis, so I expect some phails despite me reading other analyses.
Thanks to all those people who help me out with some ideas and suggestions, even if they were minor. Edits made 8/8: Did most of things jc suggested (Kinda on the fence of putting Hypnosis in AC. I'll test it out to see). Also added stuff on the possibility of Choice Scarf in the Tinted Lens set's AC and a SubPetaya set in OO. Edits made 8/10: Speed Boost was moved to OO. The analysis had general changes due to this. Edits made 8/11: After testing of Yanmega that was more successful, I the revamped team support bullets. Did some overall edits to the set as well. Edits made 8/12: Edited some typos and reworded some phrases for accuracy. Also changed this from WIP to QC 0/3 since there honestly isn't much more to add from what I alone can tell. Edits made 8/13: Fixed the picture (It was from Bulbapedia. It's now from Smogon). Also, I find it odd how slowly this thread is going... Edits made 8/23: Cleaned up some stuff due to factual errors. Bumped due to a lack a posts. Edits made 8/26: Further edits. VMing a QC member. __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __ The Fly Guy Yanmega (WIP):
[SET] Name: Tinted Lens move 1: Bug Buzz move 2: Air Slash move 3: Hidden Power Ground move 4: U-Turn Item: Choice Specs Ability: Tinted Lens Nature: Rash EVs: 4 Def / 252 SpA / 252 Spe [SET COMMENTS]
[ADDITIONAL COMMENTS]
[Other Options]
[Checks and Counters]
Original Yanmega OU analysis Last edited by ThisMysteriousGuy; Aug 26th, 2012 at 8:37:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Humblest person ever
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,648
London, UK
|
Specs should definitely be the first set. The QC team appear to be split on whether or not the Speed boost set should stay. It's frail, fairly weak and requires a lot of support, so I personally do not think it should, but leave it up there for now.
Otherwise I think this looks OK. Protect is not the most important move on the Speed Boost set. It should be moved down the order a bit. Hypnosis should be in AC for that set at the very least.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 264
Rock Tunnel
|
Quote:
Protect I was honestly questioning a bit in placement, though it's hard to decide where to put it, since all the moves are pretty important to that set. Since the Hidden Powers are used on foes that you tend to see often that give Yanmega trouble, the STAB moves are definitely going to be used in each match, and Protect is typically used once per match IF you need it, I think I'll move it down to 4th for now. I'll also edit some things in response to that. Last edited by ThisMysteriousGuy; Aug 8th, 2012 at 2:01:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Humblest person ever
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,648
London, UK
|
OK having spoken to some people, I'm now officially rejecting the Speed Boost set. It's outclassed as a Speed Boost pokemon by Sharpedo, and bearing in mind the base power of its moves, it's even less powerful than Combusken. Yes, Combusken.
To be honest, the Specs set is pretty bad too, but it does at least do something no other Pokemon does. Venomoth and Sigilyph are significantly weaker and have worse coverage, so despite the horrible SR weakness, Yanmega is still the number one Tinted Lens Pokemon. The set you have up is, I'm fairly sure, the best Yanmega can do, but I'm afraid I'm still hesitant to approve it. edit: for the love of god, please don't actually use combusken lol. I didn't say combusken was better, merely more powerful.
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by jc104; Aug 10th, 2012 at 6:50:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 264
Rock Tunnel
|
Okay. I'll be removing the Speed Boost set. I have a pastebin of it just in case, though for now, and most likely when it gets uploaded, it'll be OO. I'll change some text to reflect this.
And having used Combusken before, I concur now that I think about it. Between better STAB moves, being good on both the physical and special sides, having Swords Dance, and, most importantly, not needing as much support as Mega, it's a better Speed Boost abuser. EDIT: I've used it in NU, where it actually has some uses. I never said I used it in OU. Also, as I keep using Yanmega, I have to admit, I really have trouble saying it's truly OU viable. It's either really fast, but really frail and misses KOs, or it's more powerful and does more damage to Pokemon who resist its attacks, but a bit too slow and still can miss KOs. However, it's still the best offensive Pokemon with Tinted Lens yeah, and has a unique niche because of that. Perhaps I'm not playing him right. I'll see if there's more I can do. Last edited by ThisMysteriousGuy; Aug 10th, 2012 at 7:17:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 264
Rock Tunnel
|
After some more successful testing today, I now feel Yanmega is more viable. Specs Tinted Lens can do a great job at wallbreaking since it doesn't really have to worry about its coverage and being choiced-locked since it can double the damage of resisted hits, and can allow sweepers to clean up more easily. In addition, these sweepers can also deal enough damage to opposing Pokemon for Yanmega to smash through them without much trouble. Edited the article to reflect the success.
EDIT: Can't see much more to add. I think I'm ready to move out of WIP. Last edited by ThisMysteriousGuy; Aug 12th, 2012 at 1:14:29 PM. Reason: QC |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 264
Rock Tunnel
|
Bump due to lack of posts and cleaning some stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
I'm a macrophage
![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,849
|
Alright, I got a request to approve or reject this, but honestly, I'm not sure yet. I gave it a few games yesterday, and it's hardly done anything, so I'll have to test it a bit more. I'll get back to you.
In the mean time, can you please fix up the formatting? It should be: Quote:
__________________
Whatevs sig. QC member for OU and Ubers, VM me for a look at your analysis. Just make sure it's good. Also, if you want me to rate your team (OU/DW OU/Ubers), give me a VM. If I don't rate it, it's either 1) it's so shit it's too much trouble, 2) I'm busy, or 3) the team is fantastic and I have nothing I can suggest to you. You should be able to recognise which one. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 264
Rock Tunnel
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
I'm a macrophage
![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,849
|
Okay, I went and tested this and am going to have to say no. Basically, Yanmega is just not up to scratch. Its stats are average at best in every one of its stats. Base 116 SpA is alright, but is not strong enough with all the new bulky threats. Base 95 Speed is relatively lacking for something that isn't very bulky. Finally, you have that damn 4x Stealth Rock weakness which just makes it more trouble than its worth. Yes, Tinted Lens is cool, but Yanmega just isn't strong enough to abuse it any more, even with Specs attached. So basically, the cost/benefit of running Yanmega is just bad and is not worth it.
QC REJECTED 1/3
__________________
Whatevs sig. QC member for OU and Ubers, VM me for a look at your analysis. Just make sure it's good. Also, if you want me to rate your team (OU/DW OU/Ubers), give me a VM. If I don't rate it, it's either 1) it's so shit it's too much trouble, 2) I'm busy, or 3) the team is fantastic and I have nothing I can suggest to you. You should be able to recognise which one. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Humblest person ever
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,648
London, UK
|
I'm really sorry for letting you do all that work
QC Rejected 2/3
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 264
Rock Tunnel
|
Hmm, I see. I'll have to find something else to do an analysis for then.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,041
Seattle, WA
|
Since this isn't getting approved...
__________________
![]() |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|