|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
fearless in the face of danger
![]()
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 894
VM me for a RU QC / GP check.
|
<&SilentVerse> ughh <&SilentVerse> fine put up diglett then [Overview]
[SET] name: Memento Support move 1: Memento move 2: Earthquake move 3: Sucker Punch move 4: Stealth Rock item: Focus Sash ability: Arena Trap nature: Jolly evs: 252 Atk / 4 Def / 252 Spe [SET COMMENTS]
[ADDITIONAL COMMENTS]
[Other Options]
[Checks and Counters]
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Recipe for disaster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,235
Long Island
|
As you mentioned in the skeleton, Diglett's niche is very, very small, and the vast majority of the time it would be better to use something like Dual Screens uxie instead of diglett, nonthenless, after watching a few of your matches and trying out diglett myself (way back in Gothitelle meta tho). I'd be ok with giving this a set onsite (although some other people might not be). Just be sure to stress that if you dont need arena trap, theres usually a better option out there. If this does get approved, i might suggest adding Sand Attack in the AC over Sucker Punch, if Diglett gets a free turn to do something other than Memento, it can use Sand Attack to lower the accuracy of the opponent, crippling them even further and reducing the risk of set up, plus, Sucker Punch is mainly filler anyway.
EDIT: decided im not going to QC approve this just yet, theres been a bit of controversy over whether diglett deserves a set, once its all cleared up ill either approve or withdraw my approval.
__________________
16:46 <TLCNU> Esca literally is 2HKO'd by Stoutland Fire Fang 10:33 skylight molk put me in your sig ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by Molk; Feb 8th, 2013 at 11:14:20 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Way too gimmicky. Whimsicott and Uxie will always be superior options to Diglett since they can do more things outside of just using Memento. Sorry Diglett :<
QC Rejected 1/3
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Recipe for disaster
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,235
Long Island
|
Yeah i gave it some thought and i dont think Arena Trap+memento is enough of a niche to justify Diglett, although diglett is still a strongth ;_;.
QC Rejected 2/3
__________________
16:46 <TLCNU> Esca literally is 2HKO'd by Stoutland Fire Fang 10:33 skylight molk put me in your sig ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I crashed my car into the bridge, I don't care
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,529
~(^.^)~
|
I feel like something like this can be covered in a letter, we don't want to encourage people to use something like this in regular battles though because of just how precise you need to play it.
In normal battles the conditions have to be just right for this to work, and there are too many things that can go wrong. PLUS, if Diglett actually did something outside of simply giving the team Memento support then I'd think about giving it an analysis. But really, Memento is a one-time thing, and the opponent can still fight back even afterwards and fight off a Linoone sweep (hard to do but possible). If Diglett was capable of doing something else like sniping a few relevant threats and then going down with Memento I'd be more inclined to approve it. QC Rejected 3/3 |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|