|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,929
It's as addictive as a kick from the bass drum.
|
![]() http://www.smogon.com/dp/pokemon/tangela To begin, I would like to say that if this set gets approved that I do not wish to write a full analysis (or any of it) if at all possible. I simply want the set verified. My justification for this set is that this particular set can only be used by three Pokemon, Smeargle, Tangela, and Tangrowth. This set is geared towards UU so Smeargle is out and Tangrowth has to high of an Hp Stat to make use of Endeavor. Best case scenario: Setup Sunny Day as opponent breaks sash, Sleep opponent, Endeavor + Attack incoming Pokemon, and Endeavor the next. Effectively removing 3 Pokemon with minimal effort. Here is the set... [SET] name: Focus Sash move 1: SolarBeam move 2: Endeavor move 3: Sleep Powder move 4: Sunny Day item: Focus Sash ability: chlorophyll nature: Modest / Timid evs: 252 SpA / 252 Spe / 4 Def
__________________
Love is patient. Love is kind. Love is patient. Love is kind. Last edited by Stagnant; Aug 28th, 2010 at 8:14:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,603
Location: Chicago
|
this set is pretty cool. you can probably drop ivs on tangrowth to achieve the same effect as using tangela (the difference should be pretty small), which makes it a lot more efficient from an analysis pov since tangela doesn't have an analysis so you'd have to write everything and not just this set.
__________________
<&Gouki> whistles sig is the best thing on smogon (slightly updated 3/13/13) |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 153
|
posting to suggest having 0 hp iv's
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
maybe I just misunderstood
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,693
|
If looking at Tangrowth, worth nothing that Tangela is 10 base speed faster which means you outspeed a few scarfers and +2 Pokemon more.
Are there any writers interested in trying this out and putting together a full analysis if this gets approved?
__________________
For people who like storing things: The Box Reading and LC? LCF, LC Guide, LC Analyses Good channels: #littlecup, #C&C, #1v1, others And for SCMS editors: SCMS group |
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
I'm a macrophage
![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,848
|
Quote:
__________________
Whatevs sig. QC member for OU and Ubers, VM me for a look at your analysis. Just make sure it's good. Also, if you want me to rate your team (OU/DW OU/Ubers), give me a VM. If I don't rate it, it's either 1) it's so shit it's too much trouble, 2) I'm busy, or 3) the team is fantastic and I have nothing I can suggest to you. You should be able to recognise which one. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Jigen Makkoto
![]()
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,835
Massachusetts
|
If the point of the set is to use Endeavor and Sleep Powder, the only advantage to using Tangrowth is the 10% increase in Special Attack (for Solarbeam). Otherwise Tangela's 438 Speed after Sunny Day is a significant advantage over Tangrowth's 398. 398 is still faster than any Non-Scarfed lead, but 438 lets you outrun all Base 80 natured Scarfers, And all Base 95 Non-natured Scarfers. Timid Tangrowth and Modest Tangela have negligible difference in SpA power.
So on balance the Speed is probably more important, since Endeavor and fast Sleep Powder, not Solarbeam, are the focal points.
__________________
[17:53] <&Deck_Knight> If I Cite and Prune CiteandPrune's post, what does that make me? [17:54] <Birkal> a citeandprune cite and prunner [17:54] <%DHR> O_o lol [17:54] <+Mos_Quitoxe> Cite and Prune doesn't do enough of either [17:55] <+Mos_Quitoxe> can we make him change it or force him to pay damages [17:55] <&Deck_Knight> It would be a lot easier for him to Cite and Prune if we made him a mod. [17:56] <&Deck_Knight> I delegate this task to Birkal. [17:57] <Birkal> >:| |
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
I'm a macrophage
![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,848
|
Quote:
__________________
Whatevs sig. QC member for OU and Ubers, VM me for a look at your analysis. Just make sure it's good. Also, if you want me to rate your team (OU/DW OU/Ubers), give me a VM. If I don't rate it, it's either 1) it's so shit it's too much trouble, 2) I'm busy, or 3) the team is fantastic and I have nothing I can suggest to you. You should be able to recognise which one. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,603
Location: Chicago
|
yeah timid tangela is probably the best choice for assorted scarfers. however, I suggested tangrowth (temporarily forgetting that tangela is a little faster somehow) because it is a bit of a pain to write an entire analysis especially if you are just doing it for one set. there is a tangible difference though so I would prefer that this stayed as tangela.
I don't know why you would use energy ball on a set with sunny day... it's not like omastar is going to stay in against you unless it is a niche rindo or sash variant. even if it is, if you run timid, you can just sleep powder it (covering your bases whether it stays in or switches out to a grass resist). solarbeam's extra power is... extra power. even if the point of the set isn't to sweep per se, doing 50% more damage is nothing to scoff at. it also encourages the opponent to kill tangela asap moreso than using energy ball. (don't slash energy ball, just mention in AC.) finally, the OP needs to respond to the suggestions given by everyone and to update the OP ASAP. there is a two-week inactivity rule in the QC forum but I guess you can have a little extension just this once.
__________________
<&Gouki> whistles sig is the best thing on smogon (slightly updated 3/13/13) |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Surprise Mother Fucker
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,769
HOME
|
i really like the idea of this set, and want to test it out. if its ok with people i'd write an analysis after testing, if not, thats fine.
Last edited by whistle; Jul 5th, 2010 at 1:34:43 PM. Reason: i deleted my double post and i don't want to make you look dumber than you already are ZING |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
This was never a story that would have a happy ending.
![]() ![]()
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,041
Somewhere on the edge of the bell curve
|
The OP is being super-inactive and hasn't responded to QC suggestions, so I cannot approve this yet >_>
__________________
Everything was beautiful. Nothing hurt. I'm back, baby. Look for me in 5th gen UU! |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 137
|
Looks really cool. Will test it once I get the chance.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,297
Los Angeles, CA
|
I sent the OP a VM. As soon as he updates the OP I'll be glad to approve it.
__________________
Hey I don't have a problem with straight people, as long as they act gay in public. Resident Audi lover
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,929
It's as addictive as a kick from the bass drum.
|
I believe that I've edited the OP to the suggested specifications however I feel that Solarbeam should remain as primary special attack since you will be setting up sun a majority of the time. As stated in the OP I'd rather not write a full analysis due to my awful grammar as well as my lack of time to complete such a project.
__________________
Love is patient. Love is kind. Love is patient. Love is kind. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
is going goat
![]()
|
At least slash in Energy Ball, not just mention it in the set comments. Add that it can utilize Spin support as well, because Endeavor sets attract Ghost-type Pokemon. With proper Spin support as backup, it can come in later and do more damage or set up Sunny Day again.
__________________
New to Smogon? Afraid to jump into discussion? Introduce yourself!------------------- Fail Cup | Scramble! | RMTs: Blistering Sands (BH) Night Stall (OU) | The Fringe Tournament | ARcTicblast | Other Metagames Premier League | avatar by raikou00, signature art by Zracknel additional credit to Pocket and AccidentalGreed
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
GO JETS GO
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,090
CanaJew
|
![]() Works quite well (though it may just be surprise factor, but I doubt this lead will actually "catch on" to the point that people will expect it). The trouble is, again, that you need to write a whole analysis. It doesn't need to be lengthy, but it does need to be complete. whistle edit: if the reason you don't want to write an analysis is because of your grammar... maybe you should consider getting someone else to write the set? moving to analyses forum in any case.
__________________
f u, v Last edited by whistle; Aug 29th, 2010 at 3:58:41 AM. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|