Just a few thoughts I have about your post.
- Pumpkaboo gives Misdreavus actual competition as a defensive Ghost-type, or spinblocker, in this meta where all defensive Ghosts, bar the now banned Misdreavus, are absolutely terrible. Pumpkaboo also ha san actual ability to switch into Drilbur, which Misdreavus cannot do for fear of being hit by Earthquake and taking a great deal of damage. On top of this, Pumpkaboo has reliable recovery over Misdreavus, which Misdreavus would love to have.
- Pancham gives Meditite potential competition as being a Fighting-type with an incredible offensive movepool. Pancham gains a plethora of new toys, including Knock Off, Gunk Shot, Drain Punch, Elemental Punches, and, less notably, Superpower. Pancham also has the ability to pivot, while also helping a team member begin its sweep, which could also give us reason to leave both Misdreavus and Meditite in LC Ubers.
- Gothita can aid in the removal of Meditite, seeing as it has Shadow Ball and resists Meditite's STABs, and Gothita can also help with removing a weakened Misdreavus.
This is more along the lines of "reasoning" for a retest (as opposed to posting stuff that's unrelated at all) however it definitely helps me illustrate how irrelevant the buffs would be of some Pokemon in relation to the banned Pokemon.
1. Giving Pokemon competition in their role has literally nothing to do with their brokeness. Lowering usage does not influence power. (side note: even if it was, Meditite has a different role from Mienfoo, Timburr (often used together with Meditite, actually), and Pancham so I have little doubt that it wouldn't even lower the usage of Meditite even if it took from Mienfoo/Timburr).
2. Gothita cannot even KO Meditite and actually loses to it.
(here I go, humoring the idea of the new moves influencing the banned Pokemon)
While I'm at it, there are and were all more effective and definitely more viable ways of dealing with the banned Pokemon so the precedent has been set way higher than these changes, even if these changes would make a genuine impact on the metagame, would not influence the brokeness at all. I mean seriously, if you're suggesting things to the effect of "Gligar (or insert broken Pokemon) would not be broken if Pancham (insert Pokemon with new move) had Ice Punch (insert new move)!" I think the concept of a retest based on ORAS speaks for itself in that those things were around before on equal or better Pokemon and did not stop them from being broken.
However, as this conversation may not be healthy, in your opinion, you could address this in a manner that is healthy itself, rather than blasting your obscenities and blatant rudeness. Honestly, I see nothing wrong with theorymoning the potential outcome of what ORAS LC could become if we actually do decide to retest these threats.
(As for that last tid-bit, that may be true, however, at the time of Yanma's ban neither Archen nor Fletchling were as prominent as they currently are, and the tier was much less convoluted with an astounding amount of threats.)
I don't know why it offended you that I used words like "absurd" and that it is somehow a fucking obscenity (see what I did there?) but let's not let it actually detract from the point at hand.
Discussing something that could potentially lead to a rash decision, overturning decision made by people who, frankly, knew more, worked harder and definitely put more thought into their arguments than the current posts (hence the council process) is not healthy. This is not so much my "opinion" as it is an argued value judgement that's based on facts and experience. Anyone's "opinion" can be valid but their arguments may not be.
You're completely right that the changes in ORAS have no effect on these suspects. Indeed, these changes affect little at all (increased Pancham viability? so fucking exciting). I'll disclose fully that I played in none of these metas save the Missy one (and I was too bad during it to have an opinion). However, there seem to be three re-suspects (mainly) up for discussion: Missy, Tite, and Yanma. All of the three were banned separately, and two (Meditite and Yanma) were banned along with likely more broken threats in Krow and Tangla. While there still exists the factors that make them broken (great power / support capabilities etc), introducing them together may offset the centralization they bring, especially in a meta more suited to adapt to them. For instance, it's easier to game-plan for Yanma now that you don't need to fear Krow and Tang too. again, this isn't because of ORAS changes; in fact, the reality that we received basically nothing besides a 5th Fighting type, nearly not an change, makes us want to introduce some new ideas into the meta. We have no brokenmons to test; a retest is a monthlong fun experiment if it fails, and an even more fun general metagame if it succeeds. Why not try it with things that were not 100% certain broken in different enviornments last time?
The post that brought this up, I'm pretty sure, said something like 'now with ORAS changes, what about a retest'. I could be wrong, but that's the gist I'm getting from all of the posts anyway.
I'm not sure I like the idea of "let's do a retest for no logical reason at all" either, to be fair.
And why not do it? Well to put it simply, we decided that whatever "fun" those Pokemon brought to the metagame, they should be banned. This could have been for any reason the council decided, most of them for "because it's too powerful" and a few because "it makes it less fun". Either way, we already decided and recycling it does not exactly make sense with that in mind. I would ask the question "Why do it?" but I'd probably just get something I'd answer with this: All of the present arguments were analyzed already and decided upon (including but not limited to: fun, power, and centralization), taking away any reason to do it.