So the point seems to be "unban broken stuff to check broken stuff" when since from DPP times as now the suspect politic was "If there's something broken then ban it, even if this balance other broken stuff; suspect them afterwards" so I don't get why now the trend's changed, especially with a threat not properly reasonable to unban.because it checks/counters some pokemon thats in some regards is impossible for an ou team off 6 slots to check well either way
I'm laughing at all sheeps that said "ban" to Aegi and now "unban" cuz this is quite the same situation (im not referring this to u bluwing dw, u argued several things in this thread)
Metagame's not cool atm yeah as it wasn't before, keep banning stuff that'd be toxic, even if quite sensible in OU, was the thought and it was right (metagame went better) so now what kind of logical points would change the whole thing?
You stated that Landorus-I is really hard to check etc so why don't we just suspect it?
This would be a bad precedent that could allow stuff like Kyu-W Ho-Oh Megaluke and even Skymin back in OU :/