Don't know why people are nomming Deoxys N to be unbanned tho, especially when Deoxys S is being nommed so much.QUOTE]
Personally I don't think Deoxys-S is broken. As well, Deoxys-N never got a fair test at all. People simply assumed it was broken because Deoxys-A could 2HKO most of OU with even like Extremespeed. Deoxys-N just plain doesn't hit nearly as hard.
So, you want to ban the top 40 ?__?BAN EVERY POKEMON IN THE TOP TWENTY, THEN VOTE NEXT SUSPECT TEST ON WHO TO BRING BACK DOWN.
EDIT: in case you're wondering, this is only half satirical.
...Good catch. I was about to say "lol Tyranitar", but... Wait, we have Rotom-W too.One thing about the "ban all weather noms", have you all considered the fact that without auto-weather, Rain Dance is really, really good? Sure, Ferrothorn does a number on most Rain Dance teams, but it was something that was highly controversial in an environment where no weather exists (see 4th gen UU).
Unban Brightpowder/Lax Incense - Silly ban for something that's objectively worse than Leftovers, was extended to GSC constituting a ban on two horrible items which had been allowed for more than ten years, its only abuser got his ass kicked to Uber and the other three ones (Froslass, Gliscor and Cacturne) won't even come close to broken, or at least OU-level in usage. Besides, people want to ban Sand Veil and Snow Cloak using Evasion Clause for "consistency" without realizing this would mean a ban on Cacturne in ADV Ubers: if we have to be consistent with Evasion Clause, it means the clause has to be the same in every generation! Seems only fair to me.
Ban Stone Edge - Worst move in the game, one in every five misses and one in every eight CHs, this clearly stimulates luck and thus, uncompetitiveness. We should ban everything that's solely uncompetitive (no really, do you use Stone Edge for inflicting damage? Please niggas), and this is the first step into making Pokémon a true game ofchessskill. Also, Tyranitar gets nerfed so it's for the sake of the metagame and further balancing of the "weather war" OU has become.
Thundurus is usually used over Tornadus due to his better coverage. Thundurus learns Nasty Plot, a huge advantage over Tornadus; it can also run Lum sets quite effectively, being able to dent Chansey and Blissey quite a bit, and also destroys specially defensive Jirachi. He is also less easy to revenge kill, as he resists Bullet Punch from Scizor, the main priority user in OU.i always liked torndaus. why isnt he used more?
specs hurricane HURTS SHIT.
I agreed with your statement about banning Excadrill in the other thread, and I agree that Bright Powder/Lax Incense were silly bans, as well, but I hope you can't seriously be agreeing with Mario with Lasers on the rest of his post.You sir, have made my day. Thank you.
No, it's not a joke.
UU is all about hail ._.
The #1 guy on the UU ladder uses hail as well.
Yes, because Mario With Lasers was totally serious.I agreed with your statement about banning Excadrill in the other thread, and I agree that Bright Powder/Lax Incense were silly bans, as well, but I hope you can't seriously be agreeing with Mario with Lasers on the rest of his post.
He rants about consistency in the first portion of his post, but becomes inconsistent himself in the second part. He nominates Stone Edge, yet did not nominate Cross Chop??? A move that hits more types for SE damage, and does the exact same thing.
I am aware that there are a grand total of thirteen Pokemon that get Cross Chop, and there are only four of those thirteen that use it effectively, and only one of those four are even viable in OU Standard (The four, imo, being Toxicroak, Magmortar, Electivire, and Elekid), but still, despite a different, yet all around better typing, it does the same thing.
Please, don't cheer him on. He's clearly needs to learn to actually practice what he preaches.
I'm not agreeing with it. I just got a nice laugh out of it, and I'm pretty sure that it was a joke anyway.I agreed with your statement about banning Excadrill in the other thread, and I agree that Bright Powder/Lax Incense were silly bans, as well, but I hope you can't seriously be agreeing with Mario with Lasers on the rest of his post.
He rants about consistency in the first portion of his post, but becomes inconsistent himself in the second part. He nominates Stone Edge, yet did not nominate Cross Chop??? A move that hits more types for SE damage, and does the exact same thing.
I am aware that there are a grand total of thirteen Pokemon that get Cross Chop, and there are only four of those thirteen that use it effectively, and only one of those four are even viable in OU Standard (The four, imo, being Toxicroak, Magmortar, Electivire, and Elekid), but still, despite a different, yet all around better typing, it does the same thing.
Please, don't cheer him on. He's clearly needs to learn to actually practice what he preaches.
I hope so, but sarcasm in text is hard to read.I'm not agreeing with it. I just got a nice laugh out of it, and I'm pretty sure that it was a joke anyway.
I agreed with your statement about banning Excadrill in the other thread, and I agree that Bright Powder/Lax Incense were silly bans, as well, but I hope you can't seriously be agreeing with Mario with Lasers on the rest of his post.
Please, don't cheer him on. He's clearly needs to learn to actually practice what he preaches.
Eh...You guys are fooling yourselves if you can't see half of those nominations are jokes.
Well, it's not like we ~need~ the pokémon to meet those characteristics in BW anymore.Not to menton some excadrill also have brick break. Still, i don't think exca should be banned as of now, because he doesn't really meet the offensive uber characteristics, while there are pokemon that do and are still OU (dragonite, thundurus).
Nope, we're not (to the question of banning things based on uber characteristics).Are we still banning things based on uber characteristics? I'm not sure but i don't think so. Every single weather inducer (except abomasnow because hail sucks) undoubtely fits in support characteristics, so they would have been banned right from the start if we were still following the "Portrait of an Uber" thread. Instead, i think we are following this.
So voters can just vote to ban mons that they don't like dealing with...No, we're no longer requesting that you vote according to the uber characteristics, though they can still be used as basic guidelines.