Sorry for bringing some of these up a bit late, but I was busy shoving my face full of turkey and pecan pie :]
But anyway a few things I wanted to talk about:
Mega Glalie: I feel obligated to discuss this mon because my team just so happens to be incrediby weak to this thing and I just literally get 6-0d by it. I will start by saying that I am actually fine with glalie staying where it is as far as ranking goes, but I also really see the argument to move him up. Granted he is just simply ineffective against most offense, best case would be coming in on something he can live a hit from(not much) and then exploding for a kill. However when we get to balance and stall it starts to really "shine"(when talking about C rank mons its tough to use words like shine), I just cant see a well played glalie not getting at least 2 kills in any given match and they would usually be kills that really cripple the other team and allow for an easy clean up. I dont want to go too much into this mon because I want to get into a lot in one post, but common balance cores like heatran/ferro/slowbro dont really like dealing with glalie and he can effectively destroy that core if played right.I also want to point out that 100 speed tier is only bad when you are playing an offensive team. Basically it seems that because he is better at dealing with the otehr two playstyes and offense is more popular he is getting underrated. There are plenty of mons that are in A rank because they destroy offense and can do decent against the other two, glalie seems reversed(to a lesser extent). He has potential, subpar against offense, while pretty effective against stall and balance, I say we either keep him in C or bump up to C+, it depends how heavily you weigh opportunity cost.
Which brings me to....opportunity cost, I have mentioned this already before but I pretty strongly feel that opportunity cost should not be weighed heavily at all. The best example is latios v latios mega, mega latios is simply better than latios but if we look at the rankings we see that it is substantially worse. why? Because some people assume that you would rather have a different mega on your team so they say he isnt worth using. Unless I misunderstand which is entirely possible, I get the impression that some people are taking this thread as "what you should use on your team" opposed to what I think it is "how good is this pokemon". If an admin comes on and says its the former then I will just move on and operate under that initiative. But idk its a huge issue in ranking megas and until we get it sorted out I dont think we will get very far.
Mega Swampert- I am not as enthusiastic as others about how well he performs. He seems pretty damn inconsistent and with mons like rotom-w and ferro being just so damn common I have found him to always be pretty manageable and only seem to do exceptionally well against unprepared teams or offense. That being said I still cant really justify not putting him in A-, not for his 4 attack set but for his rain dance + 3 attack set, this allows him to basically become a rain core all on his own, and allows for a lot more team support to deal with his problem mons. He has the bulk to be apart of effective bulky cores, and gets the speed with rain dance to clean up late game. If there was a rank between B+ and A- I would put him there, but since there isnt Swamper(mega) for A-.
Mega Houndoom- just going to put my full support behind what Aragorn the King said, he made his points well and I expect to see a rise from the devil dog.
Klefki- This thing needs B+. the amount of utility it fits into one slot on your team is nothing short of amazing. I mean prankster twave, screens, spikes, with decent attacking options like foul play or play rough, he will literally never be deadweight on any team ever and will always be accomplish something that is putting pressure on the opponent. Thats the selling point for me personally, is pressure, the opponent will usually have to deal with an annoying paralysis, have to try and break through screens, or defog spikes and this can be accomplished all in one set, great defensvie typing, just a great utility mon if not the best. B+ for sure
The last thing I wanted to say about opportunity cost is I guess I am not saying completely disregard it. But I find myself struggling to say we should put Latios mega in S, I would rather see A+. So I guess I really think some people are just weighing it too heavily. But again I dont know how to go about this because it seems to be personal opinion on how much to weigh it or not, so its either never going to be solved or someone will tell us how to proceed. Sorry for bouncing around and Happy Thanksgiving!
But anyway a few things I wanted to talk about:
Mega Glalie: I feel obligated to discuss this mon because my team just so happens to be incrediby weak to this thing and I just literally get 6-0d by it. I will start by saying that I am actually fine with glalie staying where it is as far as ranking goes, but I also really see the argument to move him up. Granted he is just simply ineffective against most offense, best case would be coming in on something he can live a hit from(not much) and then exploding for a kill. However when we get to balance and stall it starts to really "shine"(when talking about C rank mons its tough to use words like shine), I just cant see a well played glalie not getting at least 2 kills in any given match and they would usually be kills that really cripple the other team and allow for an easy clean up. I dont want to go too much into this mon because I want to get into a lot in one post, but common balance cores like heatran/ferro/slowbro dont really like dealing with glalie and he can effectively destroy that core if played right.I also want to point out that 100 speed tier is only bad when you are playing an offensive team. Basically it seems that because he is better at dealing with the otehr two playstyes and offense is more popular he is getting underrated. There are plenty of mons that are in A rank because they destroy offense and can do decent against the other two, glalie seems reversed(to a lesser extent). He has potential, subpar against offense, while pretty effective against stall and balance, I say we either keep him in C or bump up to C+, it depends how heavily you weigh opportunity cost.
Which brings me to....opportunity cost, I have mentioned this already before but I pretty strongly feel that opportunity cost should not be weighed heavily at all. The best example is latios v latios mega, mega latios is simply better than latios but if we look at the rankings we see that it is substantially worse. why? Because some people assume that you would rather have a different mega on your team so they say he isnt worth using. Unless I misunderstand which is entirely possible, I get the impression that some people are taking this thread as "what you should use on your team" opposed to what I think it is "how good is this pokemon". If an admin comes on and says its the former then I will just move on and operate under that initiative. But idk its a huge issue in ranking megas and until we get it sorted out I dont think we will get very far.
Mega Swampert- I am not as enthusiastic as others about how well he performs. He seems pretty damn inconsistent and with mons like rotom-w and ferro being just so damn common I have found him to always be pretty manageable and only seem to do exceptionally well against unprepared teams or offense. That being said I still cant really justify not putting him in A-, not for his 4 attack set but for his rain dance + 3 attack set, this allows him to basically become a rain core all on his own, and allows for a lot more team support to deal with his problem mons. He has the bulk to be apart of effective bulky cores, and gets the speed with rain dance to clean up late game. If there was a rank between B+ and A- I would put him there, but since there isnt Swamper(mega) for A-.
Mega Houndoom- just going to put my full support behind what Aragorn the King said, he made his points well and I expect to see a rise from the devil dog.
Klefki- This thing needs B+. the amount of utility it fits into one slot on your team is nothing short of amazing. I mean prankster twave, screens, spikes, with decent attacking options like foul play or play rough, he will literally never be deadweight on any team ever and will always be accomplish something that is putting pressure on the opponent. Thats the selling point for me personally, is pressure, the opponent will usually have to deal with an annoying paralysis, have to try and break through screens, or defog spikes and this can be accomplished all in one set, great defensvie typing, just a great utility mon if not the best. B+ for sure
The last thing I wanted to say about opportunity cost is I guess I am not saying completely disregard it. But I find myself struggling to say we should put Latios mega in S, I would rather see A+. So I guess I really think some people are just weighing it too heavily. But again I dont know how to go about this because it seems to be personal opinion on how much to weigh it or not, so its either never going to be solved or someone will tell us how to proceed. Sorry for bouncing around and Happy Thanksgiving!