^what the title says
Essentially we seem to be wasting a lot of space with four separate DPP subforums, which collectively contain 1 analysis, which is fewer than both ADV and RBY at present. Not entirely certain why DPP is getting preferential treatment regardless since it's almost as dead, but it's probably because nobody has so much as looked at the forum for a while
I'd prefer to see an arrangement along the lines of:
RBY/GSC/ADV --- DPP --- VGC 2011 --- Articles
We could also use prefixes to denote tier in the case of DPP, should it be confusing otherwise (doubtful, but whatever's easiest I guess).
Not a lot else to explain so I'll leave it there.
Essentially we seem to be wasting a lot of space with four separate DPP subforums, which collectively contain 1 analysis, which is fewer than both ADV and RBY at present. Not entirely certain why DPP is getting preferential treatment regardless since it's almost as dead, but it's probably because nobody has so much as looked at the forum for a while
I'd prefer to see an arrangement along the lines of:
RBY/GSC/ADV --- DPP --- VGC 2011 --- Articles
We could also use prefixes to denote tier in the case of DPP, should it be confusing otherwise (doubtful, but whatever's easiest I guess).
Not a lot else to explain so I'll leave it there.
