Syberia
[custom user title]
I haven't seen a topic addressing this issue yet, so here goes:
Last gen, it was determined that there wasn't much to differentiate the different Rotom formes, especially since a lot of the time they just ran defensive sets which did not even include their new signature moves. For this reason, they were counted together for usage and tiering purposes.
This time, however, while keeping the same stat distribution, each forme has an entirely different set of weaknesses and resistances as well. It is obvious from my experience so far that Rotom-H and Rotom-W are significantly "better" competitively than the other three, and for this reason I propose that each forme be counted and tiered separately.
Last gen, it was determined that there wasn't much to differentiate the different Rotom formes, especially since a lot of the time they just ran defensive sets which did not even include their new signature moves. For this reason, they were counted together for usage and tiering purposes.
This time, however, while keeping the same stat distribution, each forme has an entirely different set of weaknesses and resistances as well. It is obvious from my experience so far that Rotom-H and Rotom-W are significantly "better" competitively than the other three, and for this reason I propose that each forme be counted and tiered separately.