Unpopular opinions

Gym Puzzles were doing it correctly skips trainers are stupid, and also evil.
At least the Quiz things, stuff like Wallace gym ice puzzle is perfectly fine (great even) and you will probably fail on a first try. So "gym puzzles were you have to purposefully fail incredibly easy tasks to not skip trainers" would probably be more fitting.
Back in D/P I skipped all trainers in Fantima's Gym, skipping Driftloon and struggling to get the National Dex because kid me didn't know about the day-based encounter, so this is a bit of a personal grudge.

The quiz ones are also very boring on replays, especially the one in X/Y since it takes so long.

The ice gym in Sinnoh is one I usually like going through again, although I disliked it as a kid. Both of Skyla's Gyms are neat as well.
 
QuentinQuonce said:
I'm baffled as to why Blackthorn Gym was the one that the developers felt needed the biggest overhall out of all the gyms (including changing Clair's team). Like, am I supposed to find the dragon pattern in the lava impressive? Because I don't and I won't.
Click to expand...
HGSS deliberately removed all instances of HMs being required in Gyms.
Blue glass said:
I've never faced a gym leader with my pokémon not in full health unless I was challenging myself, it's easy to beat every trainer on the gym and complete the puzzle, go to the pokémon center and come back to face the gym leader. I've always gave the wrong answers on the Blaine's puzzle too, it would be a waste of exp otherwise.
Click to expand...
You know you can just talk to the trainers without even doing the quiz to fight them? The door'll still open in both Gens 1 and 3.
 
AztecCroc said:
You know you can just talk to the trainers without even doing the quiz to fight them? The door'll still open in both Gens 1 and 3.
Click to expand...

You can battle them even if you give them the right answer. I do it this way for my own amusement.

Edit: This conversation about gyms made me look at HGSS Blackthorn gym a little closer and now I see the chinese dragon layout in the lava, thank you everyone i hadn't see that before.
 
Last edited:
QuentinQuonce said:
That's so but most of the gyms (Violet, Goldenrod, Ecruteak, Olivine, Mahogany) got a minor cosmetic overhaul rather than a complete redesign. They could have kept the puzzle the same and just made the boulders bridges activated by switches or something.
Click to expand...
Violet was more than just cosmetic, you could skip the trainers.
Goldenrod is entirely different aside from being vaguely Clefairy shaped.
Ecruteak is literally nothing like the Gen 2 version.
Mahogany shares the fact that it's an ice puzzle and nothing else, it is literally split into multiple rooms.
Beyond replacing the Strength puzzle with the roto-bridges, Blackthorn's closer in overall design than Mahogany or Ecruteak.
 
AztecCroc said:
Violet was more than just cosmetic, you could skip the trainers.
Goldenrod is entirely different aside from being vaguely Clefairy shaped.
Ecruteak is literally nothing like the Gen 2 version.
Mahogany shares the fact that it's an ice puzzle and nothing else, it is literally split into multiple rooms.
Beyond replacing the Strength puzzle with the roto-bridges, Blackthorn's closer in overall design than Mahogany or Ecruteak.
Click to expand...

Okay so cosmetic was the wrong word then but the changes I'm referring to are extremely small. Yes Violet added the outside path but the overall gym itself was basically the same, they didn't add a puzzle or any additional features.

I don't see how Goldenrod's is "entirely different"? The overall path through the gym is basically the same, there's added levels and trainers you can skip in both but the overall Clefairy theme is maintained. Likewise Ecruteak has a different shape but the basic puzzle of the gym is the same. Blackthorn's puzzle has pretty much nothing in common with the original beyond "path over lava".
 
I have to agree on the HGSS Blackthorn gym being worse.
Besides the points that were already mentioned, it just feels...more generic?
The lava looks boring compared to the cool bubbly astethic GSC had. (The Dragon hidden in the lava is neat though) The gym in GSC felt mysterious and foreboding in general, a place that you don't find elsewhere in the game.

While I very much like the way HGSS looks, there is also a special fondness I have for the original GSC colors...
I know this is mostly due to the "limited" GBC color palette but there is just something so crisp about them
 
Volt-Ikazuchi said:
People that set up to +6 in a Nuzlocke, especially with things like Double Team or Curse, might as well not bother doing those. What's the point if you're taking the risk element out of it?
Click to expand...
Yeah I've never really understood the appeal of a basic Nuzlocke without other restrictions to prevent cheese strats or overlevelling.

It's not even that I think it's a less 'legitimate' achievement or anything: if you don't explicitly ban these strategies then pretty much any death feels like a preventable failure
 
Volt-Ikazuchi said:
People that set up to +6 in a Nuzlocke, especially with things like Double Team or Curse, might as well not bother doing those. What's the point if you're taking the risk element out of it?
Click to expand...
I feel this way about people that hack in Rare Candies for Nuzlockes, too. I'm pretty sure both of our annoyances are focused more on Nuzlockes of difficulty hacks (some of which remove EVs as a factor when raising Pokémon), but I'll quote you: what's the point if you're taking the risk element out of it? Isn't some of the "challenge" supposed to be occasionally getting blindsided by a random crit off a random trainer?

I've had people explain the Rare Candy thing to me before, and I do see some merit in it, but Pokémon doesn't just exist for the major battles (to what extent the random battles can give you a challenge depends on the game/how you're playing, though).
 
I started using hacked Rare Candies and Vitamins in the later parts of my nuzlockes some time ago. It simply saves tons of time when a member dies, as most games were not designed for randomly taking a LV4 Mon from Route 1 and getting him up to like LV30.
Time is on short supply so it is just convenient, but I can understand people not wanting too do that

It can make stuff too easy if you use it to swap to the perfect team each major battle, but I try to avoid that.

As for Set-Up it is usually a context issue. I mostly avoid trying to Set-Up Sweep but sometimes Cheese is your only option (for example, Gen 3 Walter is just stupid without Marshtomp or Geodude, and I don't pick Mudkip because it's so good)

The good thing about nuzlockes is how customizable the ruleset is, simply play how you like
 
CPU said:
I feel this way about people that hack in Rare Candies for Nuzlockes
Click to expand...
aab.jpg


Ain't no way people are out there doing this, right? :tymp:

Leif98 said:
I started using hacked Rare Candies and Vitamins in the later parts of my nuzlockes some time ago. It simply saves tons of time when a member dies, as most games were not designed for randomly taking a LV4 Mon from Route 1 and getting him up to like LV30.
Time is on short supply so it is just convenient, but I can understand people not wanting too do that

It can make stuff too easy if you use it to swap to the perfect team each major battle, but I try to avoid that.

As for Set-Up it is usually a context issue. I mostly avoid trying to Set-Up Sweep but sometimes Cheese is your only option (for example, Gen 3 Walter is just stupid without Marshtomp or Geodude, and I don't pick Mudkip because it's so good)

The good thing about nuzlockes is how customizable the ruleset is, simply play how you like
Click to expand...
:trode:

Just have the mon hold an Exp. Share for a minute and keep playing. It's literally that easy. :worrywhirl:

CPU said:
I'm pretty sure both of our annoyances are focused more on Nuzlockes of difficulty hacks (some of which remove EVs as a factor when raising Pokémon)
Click to expand...
Nope, people actually do this on the mainline games. I kid you not. Hell, I've seen people do this in IGTL threads to prop up some mons. :facepalm:
 
in normal gameplay exp share does its part... but if you are deep into the game and want to use your LV10 mon its not gonna cut it and slow you down, and grinding sessions take too long. I used to just grind up stuff, but even in XY where you can use the cafes it just takes ages...
to clarify: I dont use them to overlevel or prop up mons to be stronger than they usually are, just to get them up to where the team was. Maybe i didn't explain myself properly:smogthink:
I use level caps, Item restrictions like most other people (I also ban Gyarados because DDDos (:bat:) can easily sweep stuff)
 
Might be the only one here to think this, but Rumble is my favorite spin off series. And this isn't just nostalgia cause i replayed the first one last year and have been playing World on and off for like the past 6 months. Granted this isn't the fairest thing for me to say cause I haven't played much of the other spin off games. I haven't touched any ranger games or the 1st snap game, have minimal time in conquest and Pokken, haven't played GO consistently since 2019 and the only PMD games I have a lot of time in are DX and GTI (maybe my opinion would change if I ever finished EOS tho).

I really like the sub genre of action games that have hundreds of diverse moves and/or weapons (like dead cells, wizard of legends, etc.) and Rumble is one of these kinds of games. Combine that with a franchise I am borderline addicted to, and it shouldn't be a surprise that I really like the rumble games. And also the way it combines this form of gameplay with Pokémon is pretty much perfect imo. I've played them all and like them all pretty well (except for rush, that one sucked lol). I see why a lot of people don't care for the series, but I really like it.
 
lemonademaker said:
Might be the only one here to think this, but Rumble is my favorite spin off series. And this isn't just nostalgia cause i replayed the first one last year and have been playing World on and off for like the past 6 months. Granted this isn't the fairest thing for me to say cause I haven't played much of the other spin off games. I haven't touched any ranger games or the 1st snap game, have minimal time in conquest and Pokken, haven't played GO consistently since 2019 and the only PMD games I have a lot of time in are DX and GTI (maybe my opinion would change if I ever finished EOS tho).

I really like the sub genre of action games that have hundreds of diverse moves and/or weapons (like dead cells, wizard of legends, etc.) and Rumble is one of these kinds of games. Combine that with a franchise I am borderline addicted to, and it shouldn't be a surprise that I really like the rumble games. And also the way it combines this form of gameplay with Pokémon is pretty much perfect imo. I've played them all and like them all pretty well (except for rush, that one sucked lol). I see why a lot of people don't care for the series, but I really like it.
Click to expand...
Pokémon Rumble holds a special place in my heart, because the first game came at a time where my Dad wanted to play video games with me, but also stopped caring about video games to be able to properly learn and play them (but also got annoyed when my kid ass self consistently beat him LOL). He was fine with Mario Kart Wii, we could have fun with it, but a father-son relationship can’t be forged solely through the fires of Mario Kart, and no other game appealed to both of us. Games that had fine gameplay for both of us also lasted for a long time, either between sensible checkpoints or just legitimately long levels.

Enter Pokémon Rumble, a game which perfectly captures being simple enough for a retirement home and complex enough for a gamer. It was also nice that the 2-player mode was a shared campaign rather than being against one another. He could have fun because he could contribute without thinking deeply, and I could have fun because even though I was carrying, he was contributing just enough that it felt like bonding and we really had to communicate. The levels were also pretty short, so when he felt he’d paid his dues in fostering a relationship he could easily say “one more level and then I’m off”, and it was satisfying enough.

Pokémon Rumble is the only game we entirely beat together during the Wii era — during the GameCube era he was more interested in video games. We came close with the Donkey Kong Country Returns games (I inherited my ADHD from him, I don’t blame him for not finishing the project lol especially when it progressed to past his skill level) and they also hold a special place in my heart because of it. Tropical Freeze was wayyy after Pokémon Rumble and it’s just such a legitimately good game that he really liked it and wanted to play it.

But yeah, there’s this weird special quality to Pokémon Rumble where it’s just this basic, pure fun mixed with a complexity that can appeal to all crowds, you hit the nail on the head.
 
Celever said:
Pokémon Rumble holds a special place in my heart, because the first game came at a time where my Dad wanted to play video games, but also stopped caring about video games to be able to properly learn and play them (but also got annoyed when my kid ass self consistently beat him LOL). He was fine with Mario Kart Wii, we could have fun with it, but a father-son relationship can’t be forged solely through the fires of Mario Kart, and no other game appealed to both of us. Games that had fine gameplay for both of us also lasted for a long time, either between sensible checkpoints or just legitimately long levels.

Enter Pokémon Rumble, a game which perfectly captures being simple enough for a retirement home and complex enough for a gamer. It was also nice that the 2-player mode was a shared campaign rather than being against one another. He could have fun because he could contribute without thinking deeply, and I could have fun because even though I was carrying, he was contributing just enough that it felt like bonding and we really had to communicate. The levels were also pretty short, so when he felt he’d paid his dues in fostering a relationship he could easily say “one more level and then I’m off”, and it was satisfying enough.

Pokémon Rumble is the only game we entirely beat together during the Wii era — during the GameCube era he was more interested in video games. We came close with the Donkey Kong Country Returns games (I inherited my ADHD from him, I don’t blame him for not finishing the project lol especially when it progressed to past his skill level) and they also hold a special place in my heart because of it. Tropical Freeze was wayyy after Pokémon Rumble and it’s just such a legitimately good game that he really liked it and wanted to play it.

But yeah, there’s this weird special quality to Pokémon Rumble where it’s just this basic, pure fun mixed with a complexity that can appeal to all crowds, you hit the nail on the head.
Click to expand...
100% agree. Co-op multiplayer is a gigantic part of the 1st game. I doubt that my memory of the game today would be as positive if I never played it with all my childhood friends back in the day and also with some adult friends relatively recently. And it really does have a good "easy to pick up but still complex" nature to it
 
Volt-Ikazuchi said:
aab.jpg


Ain't no way people are out there doing this, right? :tymp:


:trode:

Just have the mon hold an Exp. Share for a minute and keep playing. It's literally that easy. :worrywhirl:


Nope, people actually do this on the mainline games. I kid you not. Hell, I've seen people do this in IGTL threads to prop up some mons. :facepalm:
Click to expand...
Hacking rare candies is commonplace for Nuzlocke content, mainly because streamers realized that nobody wants to watch them run back and forth grinding a mon from level 42 to level 100

There are cases where you can't use an Exp. Share because that means something else is getting xp too, potentially enough to overlevel

Other people hack in other things too like vitamins, berries, money and sometimes even battle items. The general rule seems to be that if you can prove that you can obtain a resource in a way that is guaranteed to not cost you any other resources (technically could be expanded to only unrenewable resources but then you'd have to show there's no dependency loops either), then you get to hack in as many of that resource as you want

A great example of hacking things in nuzlockes was half level cap Platinum. Berries were hacked in from the start because they're renewable and cost nothing to regrow, but at one point they wanted to hack in a Metal Coat, on the basis that it could be Thief'd from wild Bronzor.

I believe it was decided against because if they got crit vs a specific mon they'd be forced to Potion and Potions were unrenewable at that point because money was unrenewable. I believe they ended up getting the Metal Coat legit and used it to evolve PKHeX Onix into Steelix. Half cap Platinum was canceled for being too boring (stalling with hacked berries for 20 min to KO a Zubat-level boring)

Finally, some ROM hacks actually start you off with infinite rare candies, meaning the concept is technically fully legitimate in those
 
Toxtection said:
Berries were hacked in from the start because they're renewable and cost nothing to regrow
Click to expand...
I thought you could only get a maximum of one berry in Platinum (an Oran from the Kazza trade) before getting to the first patches of soft soil in Floaroma Town?

Regardless, I agree about hacking in those kinds of items generally. I used to be a purist until I started doing properly difficult challenge runs (no, standard Nuzlockes don't count) and realised that hours of risk-free grinding for resources or experience wasn't actually satisfying to me and didn't feel any more 'legitimate' than fast-forwarding to the interesting parts of the run.
 
my unpopular opinion which is more about the community stuff is that i dont think every challenge also needs to be a nuzlocke. if its something like monotype then sure but anything that forces you to run 6 or less pokemon just... why are you adding nuzlocke rules lol thats kinda silly. that or where you have more than 6 options but theyre all dogshit or something. idk thats already an interesting challenge on itself, you dont also need to make it a ticking bomb with nuzlocke rules (and it also makes you lose quite a few strategies imo!)

i also dont see the fun in kaizo nuzlockes and kaizo ironmon. sure, kaizo is a trolly and rage inducing genre of fancontent but the best kaizo is consistent. Kaizo mario levels are good because their structure is set, you just have to figure out how to beat it. kaizo nuzlockes are prone to rng to get encounters that actually allow you to beat the game, ranges that allow you to survive etc. They at least show some strategizing so i understand the appeal, but kaizo ironmon throws everything out of the way and just makes it so arbritrary it loses meaning. its a luck game, get a mon that rolled good stats and good movepools and hope that your opponents dont have strong mons and you win. The only strategizing is rare pivoting moments that only happen early game (because its a challenge that makes grinding awful so at a certain point youre stuck with your mon) and you get stomped 9/10 anyway.
 
Bakugames said:
my unpopular opinion which is more about the community stuff is that i dont think every challenge also needs to be a nuzlocke. if its something like monotype then sure but anything that forces you to run 6 or less pokemon just... why are you adding nuzlocke rules lol thats kinda silly. that or where you have more than 6 options but theyre all dogshit or something. idk thats already an interesting challenge on itself, you dont also need to make it a ticking bomb with nuzlocke rules (and it also makes you lose quite a few strategies imo!)

i also dont see the fun in kaizo nuzlockes and kaizo ironmon. sure, kaizo is a trolly and rage inducing genre of fancontent but the best kaizo is consistent. Kaizo mario levels are good because their structure is set, you just have to figure out how to beat it. kaizo nuzlockes are prone to rng to get encounters that actually allow you to beat the game, ranges that allow you to survive etc. They at least show some strategizing so i understand the appeal, but kaizo ironmon throws everything out of the way and just makes it so arbritrary it loses meaning. its a luck game, get a mon that rolled good stats and good movepools and hope that your opponents dont have strong mons and you win. The only strategizing is rare pivoting moments that only happen early game (because its a challenge that makes grinding awful so at a certain point youre stuck with your mon) and you get stomped 9/10 anyway.
Click to expand...
Yeah I think you can achieve the purpose of Nuzlocke rules (creating a fail state, streamlining the gameplay by preventing you from optimising for nature/IVs) without implementing them exactly. I tend to get demotivated when I lose a battle in a challenge run anyway, so making it an automatic reset isn't too big a loss, but making every individual KO a 'death' mostly adds tedium while undermining any sense of immersion or roleplay (i.e. why are the rules different for you than anyone else in the world of the game?)

Imo Kaizo Ironmon only really works as a parasocial streaming thing where viewers are constantly on edge about the risk of a random Destiny Bond/Counter/Imposter mon/whatever. The best thing you can say about it is that it occasionally rewards really deep mechanical knowledge, but as you say it's mostly about being lucky enough to get a mon with an absurd movepool+stat distribution and, crucially, the better the mon is the less you have to think and strategise, which is pretty boring.

Ultimately, Pokemon's battle system doesn't lend itself super well to challenge runs, because if you have perfect knowledge of each AI trainer's team and behaviour while restricting yourself in terms of level, item use, and/or strategic options to a point where you're actually at risk of losing, then most battles just end up being a sequence of pre-planned actions where you're hoping none of the Bad Things happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top