NOC Working Title Mafia (Game Thread) [Mafia Wins]

HydrogenHydreigon said:
Flanders is feeling townier since his anger at my voting of him looks like it comes from a place of “I’m clearly obv town you idiot”
Click to expand...
It's not even that, it's just that locking someone for "pressure" is fucking asinine. The whole point of that is to see how they respond and retain the option to unvote them later, while locking should only be done with intent to lynch. I don't care if you're going to bed and think you'll stay that way until DL, you're not obligated to lock somebody just 'cause.
 
StupidFlandrs48 said:
It's not even that, it's just that locking someone for "pressure" is fucking asinine. The whole point of that is to see how they respond and retain the option to unvote them later, while locking should only be done with intent to lynch. I don't care if you're going to bed and think you'll stay that way until DL, you're not obligated to lock somebody just 'cause.
Click to expand...
BTW do u think I'm scum. Because I think u are.
 
StupidFlandrs48 said:
It's not even that, it's just that locking someone for "pressure" is fucking asinine. The whole point of that is to see how they respond and retain the option to unvote them later, while locking should only be done with intent to lynch. I don't care if you're going to bed and think you'll stay that way until DL, you're not obligated to lock somebody just 'cause.
Click to expand...
Locking is optimal for him because he won't have any chance to fucking lock it later. If you were wagoned because you scumslipped the vote locked would have been crucial. If you weren't, then locking or not locking votes doesn't matter lmao. Idk what you are on
 
StupidFlandrs48 said:
The whole point of that is to see how they respond and retain the option to unvote them later, while locking should only be done with intent to lynch. I don't care if you're going to bed and think you'll stay that way until DL, you're not obligated to lock somebody just 'cause.
Click to expand...
If your reaction is scummy af and you get wagoned, locking is perfectly okay
If your reaction is perfectly okay, you don’t get wagoned and 2 vote from a lock was never going to vote you out judging by the state of the wagons at the time
You say that I should’ve only pressured with the option to unvote you later, but then actively state you are choosing to ignore you how I could not have chosen to unvote you later; as seen in the scenarios above, locking does not result in an unwanted scenario nine times out of ten and is a beneficial last thing to do before leaving through for the phase
If you want to rebut this, please give me an example of how locking could result in an unwanted scenario (no, “technically 2-1-1-1-1-1-… is possible” do not count unless you can reasonably tell me how that would occur)
 
Saw some sus on pulsar whilst skimming for from what I can tell the lock on cat
To those that sr her bc it was a bad move, bad play != scumminess imo, it was in character for town pulsar and people are imperfect
With that being said I do see the argument that it was mafia pulsar trying to have an excuse for not engaging too muc hfor the rest of the phase
 
I am categorically unwilling to vote for m2h, lechen, hh, or catfries. We have plenty of good targets elsewhere in the game. I am really bothered by the popularity of the catfries wagon, when this player has mechanical info pointing to his innocence. I have put forth my own preferred lynch targets in saber, pulsar, and ecat (in that order). But since these seem unpopular with other people, I will join whatever wagon M2H or Lechen start on someone besides these 4 people (and besides myself).

We really need a trusted party to start a counterwagon if we want to have any options besides lynching catfries. Less than a day remains.
 
I may prefer lynching des to lynching ecat, so my preference list is something like saber > pulsar > des > ecat. Regardless, I am willing to defer to claimed town PRs when choosing my lynch target.
 
Catfries said:
Why is locking a townie thing to do?
Click to expand...
Because scum locking is bad because it's reckless and suspicious and scum usually try not to act like that. Plus scum wants to be able to switch votes in the end to influence the final wagons. Pulsar reads like low effort town to me for that lock tbh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top