.....
the ceo said some good stuff about no ai and loving animation as a medium so twitter was a bit hyped up about the studioView attachment 662533
omfg I thought this was a bit. People actually expected Despicable Me 4 to be good.
Has the day of judgement finally come? Have enough early 2010s kids grown up to make "Illumination is/was a good studio and <new film> is beneath their standard of quality" an unironic consensus take?
I apologize SW prequel fans. I thought you represented the pinnacle of delusional nostalgia-fueled cope. Hoooly shit.
It is the best 5/10 that I've ever seen, to be fair.also people who have mario pfps somehow think the mario movie is anything more than a 5/10
As a huge lifelong Mario fan who played like 10 Mario games before I was 7, it sure was nostalgia pandering with Chris prattIt is the best 5/10 that I've ever seen, to be fair.
this is one clickbait youtube thumbnail; i do not think people had these colossal hopes on despicable me 4. it followed after minions: rise of gru, which both critics and audiences seemed to like fine enough on rt, so some tempered optimism was probably reasonable, but i think you're overreactingView attachment 662533
omfg I thought this was a bit. People actually expected Despicable Me 4 to be good.
i mean, theyre old enough, im sure youve seen them put pokemon black and white on a pedestalHave enough early 2010s kids grown up to make "Illumination is/was a good studio and <new film> is beneath their standard of quality" an unironic consensus take?
also people who have mario pfps somehow think the mario movie is anything more than a 5/10
As a huge lifelong Mario fan who played like 10 Mario games before I was 7, it sure was nostalgia pandering with Chris pratt
It is the best 5/10 that I've ever seen, to be fair.
the tortured posters departmentAll we need is for Taylor Swift to make 20 nearly identical copies of the same old-school webpage, and we'll be in business!
I don't agree but I respect your opinion and I'm glad you respect the fact I don't like the movieThis rating is over-jaded to me. Mario movie is not a sophisticated narrative, its not something people who don't like mario need to be rushing to see, and it's not something you're unreasonable for not liking (that part specifically to ant and not a.n.). I'm not going to be silly and say stuff like that. But it had valuable goals of "immerse a caring audience in a new type of experience" and "have good-spirited fun with silly personalities", and it executed them well. Providing that immersive experience to existing fans is not as easy as chucking in nostalgia references and famous actors-ask people how they feel about The Rise of Skywalker. That immersion effort didn't land for you, and again that's reasonable–it only partially did for me–but that doesn't take away from the good choices they made and the bad choices they avoided. I saw the movie in theaters so my recollection on specific details is fuzzy, but as an example, I thought Bowser's personality was an excellent mixture of goofiness and legitimate threat that did him a great service and worked perfectly for the movie. Peach being the knowing guide for "fish out of water" Mario is a great, clever way to give her a meaningful role in the story in a way the games often don't. Even in story-focused games, even when she is playable, she can be pretty tacked-on. The Toads taking her in as a lost baby is a brilliant move that makes her normal princess role a lot more compelling and even emotional.
I'd probably give it around an 8/10. Not fine art, but serving a valuable purpose.
I was being a bit silly, and I'm trying to ween myself off of numerical scores for media, but I definitely wouldn't give the film a higher score than 7/10 if I was inclined to assign it one. I found it to be a likeable, competent film that largely succeeded at what it set out to do, but what it set out to do didn't really do a whole lot for me. For me to give a film a score as high as an 8/10, there has to be a level of resonance or emotional impact that I didn't really get here. It's a well-constructed fish out of water story, and the result is a perfectly serviceable film, but not one that rises above the level of popcorn flick for me. It has utilitarian function, but that doesn't cut it in my view.This rating is over-jaded to me. Mario movie is not a sophisticated narrative, its not something people who don't like mario need to be rushing to see, and it's not something you're unreasonable for not liking (that part specifically to ant and not a.n.). I'm not going to be silly and say stuff like that. But it had valuable goals of "immerse a caring audience in a new type of experience" and "have good-spirited fun with silly personalities", and it executed them well. Providing that immersive experience to existing fans is not as easy as chucking in nostalgia references and famous actors-ask people how they feel about The Rise of Skywalker. That immersion effort didn't land for you, and again that's reasonable–it only partially did for me–but that doesn't take away from the good choices they made and the bad choices they avoided. I saw the movie in theaters so my recollection on specific details is fuzzy, but as an example, I thought Bowser's personality was an excellent mixture of goofiness and legitimate threat that did him a great service and worked perfectly for the movie. Peach being the knowing guide for "fish out of water" Mario is a great, clever way to give her a meaningful role in the story in a way the games often don't. Even in story-focused games, even when she is playable, she can be pretty tacked-on. The Toads taking her in as a lost baby is a brilliant move that makes her normal princess role a lot more compelling and even emotional.
I'd probably give it around an 8/10. Not fine art, but serving a valuable purpose.
I recently made a different kind of video game tier list. Not a list of my favorite games, or the games I think are the highest quality, but the games that have impacted me the most. It's a funny list because I haven't played many of the games on here, let alone beaten them.
omfg I thought this was a bit. People actually expected Despicable Me 4 to be good.
You say this despite not having engaged with every piece of art ever made?there's not a piece of art that feels more dreamlike than the Eric Andre Show
I legit had dreams of episodes that don't exist from the show where I was sure that they were actual episodes until I looked up the list of existing episodesYou say this despite not having engaged with every piece of art ever made?
i feel bad cuz i beat FF7R in like two weeks on PC, but ff7r2 on PS5, played it for like 15 hours and then gave my PS5 to my dad when i upgraded my pcFF7 Remake and FF7 Rebirth are the only games that have actually managed to feel "next-gen" to me, which is funny considering the former came out the last one. Every time I see environments or boss fights from either of them I am absolutely blown away. The combination of Square Enix's absurd modern visual polish and the marvelous art direction & world of FF7 result in a pair (soon to be a trilogy) of games that look like they're from the future. I already concluded a while ago that I made the right decision not hopping on the PS5 or Series X, but sometimes I compare the new and improved Midgar to the comparatively rinky-dink cities and wilds of first party Switch games and wonder if I'm just coping. If we got a mascot legendary Pokemon fight at even a quarter of the Jenova Dreamweaver or the Sephiroth battles' spectacle I would NEVER recover