I WENT TO DINNER AND GHOSTED SORRY
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
NOC Rise of Team Galactic Mafia - OVER, Mafia Win
- Thread starter AngryPidgeon
- Start date
no one yet but gun to my head it'd be ag
i understand where your ag read comes but i just do not think their posting has been up to par
heavy agree with your reads on alice and ne, and the alice/flandrs situation too to an extent, i think ppl are treating it too definitively, it's above rand but also shouldnt put that much weight into it
heavy agree with your reads on alice and ne, and the alice/flandrs situation too to an extent, i think ppl are treating it too definitively, it's above rand but also shouldnt put that much weight into it
fwiw im down for a ag/ne vote too, be these two have been defending flandrs, who is quite a scummy slot, which could easily both be scum defending scum or scum defending a scummy town for towncred.
funny how as soon as i started scumreading you for defending flandrs you switch your vote. hmmmm
honestly I think AG might have just gotten pocketed by Flandrs, I don’t see his willingness to drop a vote to push wagons to 5-2. NE’s interaction / progression on Flandrs is what worries me
I think our vote should be in between Flandrs/NE for now
Townlock
me
Townread
Alice
Townlean
HyHy
CK (#292 seems unpairing from NE)
Null:
AG (read above)
Scumread:
NE
Flandrs
Townlock
me
Townread
Alice
Townlean
HyHy
CK (#292 seems unpairing from NE)
Null:
AG (read above)
Scumread:
NE
Flandrs
I don't see how #292 unpairs the two
I don’t see why scum!NE would push his partner when he could just as easily townread them for their reads, could be distancing but I don’t think it is
i would not unpair someone that easily, esp since ne didn't even sr CK in that post, much less townlean them for that but you do you i suppose
What do you think about neon. I feel like people forget about him adding fuel to the fire there.
I spent 20 minutes wondering what to do when I read flandrs first post because when I read it my first thought was that he was Ghetsis. So yeah I decided to claim later and not at that time to see how people interact with him. I originally intended later in D1 but there was nothing happening in the game honestly. Have you fully caught up?
Deadline is in about 5 hours.
Vote Count 1.5
StupidFlandrs48 (5) - Alice Kazumi, Lechen, Dead by Daylight, CrreamyKitty, Aura Guardian
Alice Kazumi (1) - StupidFlandrs48
HydrogenHydreigon (1) - saberslasher11
saberslasher11 (1) - bluedoom
no lynch (1) - JALMONT
not voting: HydrogenHydreigon, NightEmerald, ImaginaryNeon, Ehmcee, pulsar512b, Celever
Vote Count 1.5
StupidFlandrs48 (5) - Alice Kazumi, Lechen, Dead by Daylight, CrreamyKitty, Aura Guardian
Alice Kazumi (1) - StupidFlandrs48
HydrogenHydreigon (1) - saberslasher11
saberslasher11 (1) - bluedoom
no lynch (1) - JALMONT
not voting: HydrogenHydreigon, NightEmerald, ImaginaryNeon, Ehmcee, pulsar512b, Celever
Last edited:
Flandrs/Alice should be a difference check, NE’s progression has been horrible as well
What's a difference check?
Flandrs feels like the best one right now, but when I think further, it just feels too easy.
Everything lines up too well, and it's mostly based around one (1) of Flandrs' posts and Alice's claim, which could also refer to someone else potentially playing similarly to how I did in a game I had on MU where I was a Lost arsonist and basically just tried to solve as normal, albeit very slightly more nonchalantly. (Ignore Day 3 because I got tracked.)
The main issue with such a possibility is that finding a Lost mafia member with that sort of playstyle would probably be legitimately difficult and could very easily result in false positives. The only reason I got found in that game was because I got tracked on Day 1.
And this is all ignoring the hypothetical world where Alice's role is just an elaborate hoax.
Everything lines up too well, and it's mostly based around one (1) of Flandrs' posts and Alice's claim, which could also refer to someone else potentially playing similarly to how I did in a game I had on MU where I was a Lost arsonist and basically just tried to solve as normal, albeit very slightly more nonchalantly. (Ignore Day 3 because I got tracked.)
The main issue with such a possibility is that finding a Lost mafia member with that sort of playstyle would probably be legitimately difficult and could very easily result in false positives. The only reason I got found in that game was because I got tracked on Day 1.
And this is all ignoring the hypothetical world where Alice's role is just an elaborate hoax.
*the best vote
If one is scum the other is town
I'm chalking this possibility up to overconfidence and/or missing a detail that hey, there's a role that knows you exist. Seriously, the number of people who don't bother to fully read instructions... I'm very jaded on people actually reading everything. Probably why the role PMs are so short and sweet.
In my case N is supposed to be tracking Ghetsis to Sinnoh so unless N tracking skills are really bad I see no reason for Ghetsis to know N is doing that
Like it was specified that I know ghetsis but not the opposite.
Oh, I lost the "not the opposite" detail in the mess of things. I guess that explains it. More fuel on Flandrs's fire, then.In my case N is supposed to be tracking Ghetsis to Sinnoh so unless N tracking skills are really bad I see no reason for Ghetsis to know N is doing that
Like it was specified that I know ghetsis but not the opposite.
Ik I’m not really posting but something like this kinda kills game momentum cos there’s little game to play, Flandrs is just dying and probably caught mafia
Trying to read into spew isn’t that effective because after enough people bought into Alice’s stance (which was rather immediate) mafia are incentivised to either bus or look as clueless as possible, which sure is what the whole game did
Except saber not saying anything at all might legit be scummy but yk
Trying to read into spew isn’t that effective because after enough people bought into Alice’s stance (which was rather immediate) mafia are incentivised to either bus or look as clueless as possible, which sure is what the whole game did
Except saber not saying anything at all might legit be scummy but yk
It was not inmediate. 4 players voted me right after I claimed. 3 without including flandrs so there was some resistance.
I agree on saber but why focus on saber instead of let's say Jalmont? To be fair I do think saber has been scummy but other players have pointed him and not others in similar position and that makes me suspicious.
As I said on a post earlier I originally planned to claim later but there was nothing happening with 3 players not playing and a others with basically 0 content. I don't know what I'm supposed to do with that so I decided to be proactive earlier. Honestly I don't think it can kill game momentum when there was no momentum in the first place
because Jalmont noped out of the day before your claim so his noping out is, in principle, unrelatedIt was not inmediate. 4 players voted me right after I claimed. 3 without including flandrs so there was some resistance.
I agree on saber but why focus on saber instead of let's say Jalmont? To be fair I do think saber has been scummy but other players have pointed him and not others in similar position and that makes me suspicious.
As I said on a post earlier I originally planned to claim later but there was nothing happening with 3 players not playing and a others with basically 0 content. I don't know what I'm supposed to do with that so I decided to be proactive earlier. Honestly I don't think it can kill game momentum when there was no momentum in the first place
rather immediate as opposed to actually immediate but yeah. at this point no one is contesting it
that post wasn't accusatory btw, it's fine that it killed momentum, but it did. you're right the game didn't have any already but it was early so it could have built some :P
Them not saying anything with content doesn't have anything to do with my claim. It's more like them not being active is not good for town but one has been called out for that by you and bluedoom while no one has done the same with jalmont.
the difference is that saber is self-proclaimed lurking and Jalmont is self-proclaimed not in the thread at all
they've given themselves different expectations
it's not deep, it hardly means that saber is actually scum, but it is a point for him being scummy. if you're around and going to hop in the thread to defend yourself when pressed on something, you should also have a say in the main/only important thing to happen today.
I think Flandrs is in anti-spew at the minute and so is NE, is the game this easy or am I missing something? AG still responding makes me feel even more like a town that just got it wrong