NOC E.G.O Wielders Mafia - A 17P Role Madness (Game Thread) - MAFIA WIN

[wisteriapurple]

oh i just saw the post in question
uhhh i still \disagree that it could come from 3p!AP tbh
i do agree with the sentiment that focusing on mafia is probably just better for now

 

[wisteriapurple]

That whole part of the post just felt like he was trying to turn the conversation away from that possibility, and I just feel like that might have been done in bad faith.

but yeah seen on this

 

[Celever]

Yeah it is better to focus mafia bc 3p could shoot mafia or eat a bullet for us

So you’re right but AP’s bailed by good strategy

 

[Celever]

But AP pocketed me bc he has made my inability to do maths benefit me for the first time in my life so

 

[ImaginaryNeon]

Plus, 115 just feels a bit too sudden of a shift for me, but it's still in a bit of a grey area.

 

[ImaginaryNeon]

Yeah it is better to focus mafia bc 3p could shoot mafia or eat a bullet for us

So you’re right but AP’s bailed by good strategy

I'm just keeping an eye out for a 3p until we have some evidence to the contrary.
Plus, it's Day 1. I'll take what I can get.

 

[CrreamyKitty]

Ok wisp’s reads are actually kinda decent, I did jump the gun in thinking she was just gonna push out a bunch of zero posters lmao.

##Unvote
##Vote: StupidFlandrs48

 

[ImaginaryNeon]

Oh, weird as fuck wordings made to fit my sheets' formatting, how I've missed you.

 

[Celever]

##vote: CrreamyKitty

Coloured reads list where all your takes are the same as wisteria’s -> scumreading wisteria for her readslist is giving “not really solving” bestie

 

[CrreamyKitty]

##vote: CrreamyKitty

Coloured reads list where all your takes are the same as wisteria’s -> scumreading wisteria for her readslist is giving “not really solving” bestie

My wallpost was before she posted her reads

 

[Celever]

Oh, weird as fuck wordings made to fit my sheets' formatting, how I've missed you.
View attachment 751979

I hope you’re not using literacy as a measure for alignment

None of us can read its NAI

 

[skippergamez]

I’m pinged a bit by the hedginess at the end of this post, also think yapping about mech is generally pretty NAI and a good way to look like you’re doing something without doing something as scum

Was the post linked to this enough to believe in scum!pulsar? Like I think you’re disagreeing with pulsar when you say “also think yapping about mech is generally pretty NAI and a good way to look like you’re doing something without doing something as scum.” Idk this reasoning is making my brain hurt pls help me. Also, you gave her a +1 literally the comment before this. Basically, what’s your read on pulsar lol.

 

[Celever]

My wallpost was before she posted her reads

Yeah by a minute that’s the problem

You just finished a wallpost, Wisteria immediately posts the same post (you were working on them at the same time), but you scumread her opinions which are the same as your opinions besides pulsar

 

[CrreamyKitty]

Was the post linked to this enough to believe in scum!pulsar? Like I think you’re disagreeing with pulsar when you say “also think yapping about mech is generally pretty NAI and a good way to look like you’re doing something without doing something as scum.” Idk this reasoning is making my brain hurt pls help me. Also, you gave her a +1 literally the comment before this. Basically, what’s your read on pulsar lol.

The disagreement isn’t why I scumread her and moreso just me going on a tangent, I scumread her for how that line of thought goes in circles and ended up nowhere conclusive.

 

[ImaginaryNeon]

I hope you’re not using literacy as a measure for alignment

None of us can read its NAI

Nah it's pretty clear that 97 and 98 were at least mostly jokey, but I just don't really have room to put that

 

[skippergamez]

The disagreement isn’t why I scumread her and moreso just me going on a tangent, I scumread her for how that line of thought goes in circles and ended up nowhere conclusive.

Ok, yeah I agree that the post was bad. For me it’s not enough to scumlean her. But thank you for clarifying.

 

[Celever]

Ok I reread I understand what you posted now CK I misread this

Ok I scumread wisp for a post that looks like she’s planning to just kill all the lowposters

Then she has flandrs at the bottom of her reads and votes him as soon as I post that

jdhdhdhsbsbdbbd

 

[Celever]

##UNVOTE

YW for the excellent wagon can’t believe I’m carrying so hard

 

[CrreamyKitty]

Yeah by a minute that’s the problem

You just finished a wallpost, Wisteria immediately posts the same post (you were working on them at the same time), but you scumread her opinions which are the same as your opinions besides pulsar

The “hrhrjshshdhd” wasn’t me scumreading her opinions, it’s me being surprised that her reads aligned with mine.

 

[Celever]

Anyway I wonder what style of reasonable crashout Flandrs is gonna have when he realises he’s odds on favourite to be voted out today

I’m thinking quiet anger but I could also see a louder alternative

 

[Ch3mdah]

Ch3mdah - posted a NV + some discussion of flavour i.e. NAI

i'm assuming NAI means no available info? what does NV mean tho

 

[CrreamyKitty]

i'm assuming NAI means no available info? what does NV mean tho

NAI = Not alignment indiciative
NV = No vote

 

[Celever]

AP
wisteria
CK
—
Neon
Ch3
Pulsar
—
Everyone else
—
Evie
Skipper
—
Flandrs

 

[wisteriapurple]

i'm assuming NAI means no available info? what does NV mean tho

NAI = not alignment-indicative here oops
NV = no vote

 

[CrreamyKitty]

Wisp sniped again, get your wpm up