I haven’t asked anyone a question yeti didn't know you became des
I haven’t asked anyone a question yeti didn't know you became des
That’s exactly what that post was doing correctAs I see it celever is playing into the role of a spectator which doesn’t really affect his position in the thread if you flip town or scum, if flandrs flips town now, sure id 100% look into celever because the time worn trope of tvt while scum lets it happen is a thing but i don’t really think voting celever off the rip is a good idea w/o more words in the thread.
If I had to pick a cw itd be fairy unfortunately this is how fairy always plays so my issues wrt urgency could literally be =rand.
I vaguely remember underrating you frequently
dont really have one they’re just relatively directionless. If i were mean id call it overtly leaning into being new but I don’t even know if that’s aligned with their experience, see des. Ideal scenario is that it’s confirmed via a pr.NightEmerald give a read on Evie please thanks king
you are not hallucinatingWhere is Apricity?? Am I hallucinating or is he liking a lot of posts and lurking
in my post I mentioned that the small sample size meant that my observations were really NAIKind of, yes. I didnt really agree with Skipper that Celever was being proactive at the time Skip said that. With a small handful of posts, the only thing I remembered of Celevers post at that point was the mafia team size speculation which was not much.
I think you’re referring to popcornBut there’s also a chance I tunnelled him in popcorn and he was town
There’s additionally a chance he didn’t even play popcorn
i mean i did outline my thoughts in #146 so like /shrugSo, of course, proper reasoning would be appreciated.
(Crreamy is probably the worst offender in this case, since he? just mentioned having scumpings there after a(n) ISO/rereading without citing any posts or points for said pings to be based on.)
why not re: skipper actuallyI mean, haven't I done that already? I've expressed disagreement with two of her strongest reads (Cel, AP) and written off a third as LHF (me), and the rest of the list can easily be considered a low-effort nothingburger that creates very little town equity. I guess I could discuss the skipper read but I don't really want to discuss that slot so ???
how come? there has been quite a bit of discussion on his slot so i feel like dismissing it with "basically irrelevant" is uhhhh well im not a fanEverything about Flandrs is basically irrelevant
he is indeed liking stuffWhere is Apricity?? Am I hallucinating or is he liking a lot of posts and lurking
nothing flandrs has said will matter in 2 cycles, everyone's opinions will develop further based on actual events and statements that have real backing to them, it's day 1 - if anyone tries to use the d1 flandrs discussion as evidence of anything of value down the line they are trying to sell you a bridgehow come? there has been quite a bit of discussion on his slot so i feel like dismissing it with "basically irrelevant" is uhhhh well im not a fan
i guess but then what would you propose we do nownothing flandrs has said will matter in 2 cycles, everyone's opinions will develop further based on actual events and statements that have real backing to them, it's day 1 - if anyone tries to use the d1 flandrs discussion as evidence of anything of value down the line they are trying to sell you a bridge
we are using d1 flandrs to determine the d1 votenothing flandrs has said will matter in 2 cycles, everyone's opinions will develop further based on actual events and statements that have real backing to them, it's day 1 - if anyone tries to use the d1 flandrs discussion as evidence of anything of value down the line they are trying to sell you a bridge
Because any opinion of him will inevitably be colored by whether you think his soft is real or not, and it's not healthy to pressure him about that rn anywaywhy not re: skipper actually
As a professional bridge salesman I am deeply offended by thisnothing flandrs has said will matter in 2 cycles, everyone's opinions will develop further based on actual events and statements that have real backing to them, it's day 1 - if anyone tries to use the d1 flandrs discussion as evidence of anything of value down the line they are trying to sell you a bridge
not get so stuck in the mud over a disagreement that holds no water and makes no sensei guess but then what would you propose we do now
uh wdyt about the read NE posited regarding him tho i was honestly hoping to hear more on that frontBecause any opinion of him will inevitably be colored by whether you think his soft is real or not, and it's not healthy to pressure him about that rn anyway
if you wanna use the equivalent of a random number generator to decide the d1 vote that's finewe are using d1 flandrs to determine the d1 vote
##Vote: a fairy
Disagreeing is like, how readable content starts to be producednot get so stuck in the mud over a disagreement that holds no water and makes no sense
Trying to stop the pressure as a means of waiting for pressure is an interesting one nglif you wanna use the equivalent of a random number generator to decide the d1 vote that's fine
i will simply wait for end of day when there starts being actual pressure
can we at least poke at the readable content where 2 people posted nearly identical reads and then one of them went "and the other one's lost their mind their reads are so bad" or whatever, or do we have to focus on the molehill mountainDisagreeing is like, how readable content starts to be produced
Idt this post was informed.Anyway I wonder what style of reasonable crashout Flandrs is gonna have when he realises he’s odds on favourite to be voted out today
I’m thinking quiet anger but I could also see a louder alternative
Actually can you explain your Evie read here based on a singular post at the time iircAP
wisteria
CK
—
Neon
Ch3
Pulsar
—
Everyone else
—
Evie
Skipper
—
Flandrs
Bolded is always concerningI also don't quite get the flandrs votes, to me it seems like someone who just wants to make some reads based off the little information available at the time. They are a little aggressive but I feel like its understandable to throw out reads without the intention of starting a wagon.
Also, are we sure we want to vote someone out today, I'm not experienced enough with mafia to know when voting is optimal
I agree that vibes are king d1, but I’m a little confused on how you got to “it’s pretty unlikely for D1.” Maybe we have different perceptions, but in my experience because people have unformed reads, they just follow the consensus.Nothing Celever is posting here makes me feel any better about him.
I hope you're talking more generally now, because the "fuck it info vote" thing might happen over the course of the game but it's pretty unlikely for D1. Vibes are king on D1, not actual confident reads. I also object to being the only person who has a confident-lite scumread, wis seems somewhat convinced about me if nothing else (again, understandable)
It's not an OMGUS if I object to your comments rather than your vote; I'd respond similarly if said comments were accompanied by an unrelated vote or no vote at all. But hey, if it helps you sleep at night, go right ahead with the "quiet anger OMGUS" narrative.
I agree with this observation and it feels like it comes from a town.Flandrs definitely feels like he's being the abrasive townie version of himself, I'll say that much from this page