My deal with Flandrs is #224 and onwards he’s just unfortunately easier to read when angry so I added fuel to the initial fire with macro shitthen what is your deal w/ flandrs LOL
is the evie pair entirely off of 213???My deal with Flandrs is #224 and onwards he’s just unfortunately easier to read when angry so I added fuel to the initial fire with macro shit
But also the macro is giving scum largely because I think he’s partnered with Evie
Th-the case on Flandrs (by others) is he was picking fights intentionally and trying to push the game alongforming a wagon on me for picking fights intentionally and trying to push the game along is better than forming a wagon on flandrs for doing nothing
hold up talk to me about this pairingMy deal with Flandrs is #224 and onwards he’s just unfortunately easier to read when angry so I added fuel to the initial fire with macro shit
But also the macro is giving scum largely because I think he’s partnered with Evie
How is he partnered with EvieMy deal with Flandrs is #224 and onwards he’s just unfortunately easier to read when angry so I added fuel to the initial fire with macro shit
But also the macro is giving scum largely because I think he’s partnered with Evie
Yeis the evie pair entirely off of 213???
Evie’s content is a LAMIST which is a really minor scumlean thinghold up talk to me about this pairing
is it that you scumread those two independently or is there something that has pinged you as "these two are paired"
you and i have seen entirely different flandrs in this threadTh-the case on Flandrs (by others) is he was picking fights intentionally and trying to push the game along
I basically had the same read on Flandrs so I’m a little confusedI also don't quite get the flandrs votes, to me it seems like someone who just wants to make some reads based off the little information available at the time. They are a little aggressive but I feel like its understandable to throw out reads without the intention of starting a wagon.
Also, are we sure we want to vote someone out today, I'm not experienced enough with mafia to know when voting is optimal
It just caught me off guardEveryone really perked up when I said that ahahah
I added the by others bc I don’t really think it’s scummy to do that but it’s literally the case everyone made against him was he was picking dumb fights and making reachesyou and i have seen entirely different flandrs in this thread
flandrs posting a nothingburger post, got like voted 3 times, defended himself, and now he's "picking fights intentionally and trying to push the game along" what
well you posted a bonkers take from someone known to be a quiet "oh i couldnt possibly imagine anyone doing anything" going "oh i couldnt possibly imagine anyone doing anything" and being quietEveryone really perked up when I said that ahahah
yeah and i put 0 stock in any of those other people's reads like ive said, so i inherently dont think flandrs is doing what they're allegating, so its not contradictory to say that im doing thatI added the by others bc I don’t really think it’s scummy to do that but it’s literally the case everyone made against him was he was picking dumb fights and making reaches
about someone* not from someone ebwopwell you posted a bonkers take from someone known to be a quiet "oh i couldnt possibly imagine anyone doing anything" going "oh i couldnt possibly imagine anyone doing anything" and being quiet
yeah and i put 0 stock in any of those other people's reads like ive said, so i inherently dont think flandrs is doing what they're allegating, so its not contradictory to say that im doing that
Sure ok, the interpretation I had was you were saying “finally some good fucking food” to your case when the food is identical to the Flandrs oneforming a wagon on me for picking fights intentionally and trying to push the game along is better than forming a wagon on flandrs for doing nothing
Also it wasn’t ragebait
I don't even need to caption this. And once again, if my response to you is an OMGUS, why am I not directing these feelings towards the people who voted me before that?My deal with Flandrs is #224 and onwards he’s just unfortunately easier to read when angry so I added fuel to the initial fire with macro shit
And I don't like this either but saying I'm paired with her based on one post that can be scummy and LAMIST entirely independent of my alignment is so weakEvie’s content is a LAMIST which is a really minor scumlean thing
And then their only content post is a fairly hard defence of Flandrs to try and redirect thread momentum
Hey I’ve been on Evie since this morning but sure I guess you got me to say it in those terms lmaowell we were 13 pages in and like, the only thing we could read about was something that i thought had 0 value, so i introduced something that maybe will have more than 0 value
it got skipper to place a vote and make a read and it got you to say that bonkers take about evie
i am satisfied with my time spent and look forward to replying to more posts, whether or not they are fights or not!
i feel like saying that the wagon formed on flandrs was off of him doing nothing isnt a very fair assessment to makeforming a wagon on me for picking fights intentionally and trying to push the game along is better than forming a wagon on flandrs for doing nothing
you ever see those scenes in courtroom comedies where the defendant says something and their lawyer gives them a "are you serious?" lookThese posts have been so bad that I have a hard time believing Celever's in control of his own account rn, maybe he was hacked