NOC Electoral Mafia - Game thread

GOOD VIBES
Realiti
AF
Pebble
Peum

I REALLY DONT WANT TO VOTE YOU OUT IF I CAN AVOID IT IN CASE WE'RE BOTH TELLING THE TRUTH VIBES
Pulsar

NO VIBES
Carrotman
Larry
Tsuki
DBD

WEIRD VIBES
Jalmont
AP (Leans between this and a no, he has a very high postcount relative to what I'd percieve to be his impact in the thread but I'd wanna fully ISO him again before I'd commit to a vote if I could actually vote)
AirC
 
If miyami were to be mafia my best bet is that they're a roleblocker who after roleblocking cant vote the next day, so they needed a fakerole to claim early to justify them not having votes
It could just be a role that blanks votes. That would be the simplest explanation in my mind. Considering she claimed something that blocks investigatives from working iirc amd also strips votes like that is not hard to imagine as a maf role.
 
GOOD VIBES
Realiti
AF
Pebble
Peum

I REALLY DONT WANT TO VOTE YOU OUT IF I CAN AVOID IT IN CASE WE'RE BOTH TELLING THE TRUTH VIBES
Pulsar

NO VIBES
Carrotman
Larry
Tsuki
DBD

WEIRD VIBES
Jalmont
AP (Leans between this and a no, he has a very high postcount relative to what I'd percieve to be his impact in the thread but I'd wanna fully ISO him again before I'd commit to a vote if I could actually vote)
AirC
Alri so I seem to be the person you have the most to say about. I haven't been pushing anyone too hard nor have I claimed anything. Otherwise Id say my impact has been par for the course. I have been trying to make reasonable posts about the setup, if you think Im being a bit milquetoast Id agree but Im not just posting bs..
 
It does seem for certain that Miyami was able to have her vote removed.
It could just be a role that blanks votes. That would be the simplest explanation in my mind. Considering she claimed something that blocks investigatives from working iirc amd also strips votes like that is not hard to imagine as a maf role.
Which scenario would you think is more likely? This seems to be pulling in two different directions.
Alri so I seem to be the person you have the most to say about. I haven't been pushing anyone too hard nor have I claimed anything. Otherwise Id say my impact has been par for the course. I have been trying to make reasonable posts about the setup, if you think Im being a bit milquetoast Id agree but Im not just posting bs..
Yeah, that's kind of my point. Even your posts about me/pulsar post pulsar claim have felt like shading me just for you to turn around and vote larry. I'm not really sure where your convictions actually lie at this point yet
 
Miyami pulsar is not a 1v1, very easy to imagine miyami being a force-commuter rather than capital d doctor, it’d make whoever they pick untargetable and I fully could see the logic of “well you are still traveling back so you can’t vote” or smth
 
Why Larry now when you wanted to vote Peum or Jalmont earlier?
Peums stance on this being a 10:4 and therefore having strong investigatives is logical. I think the lack of NK suggests that the inverse is the case: maybe maf is just a weak faction compared to a normal game. Which is the assumption I was operating under.

I still have doubts about him but like I wont harangue him over perceived lack of active solving relative to his prior self. He certainly isnt lurking by any measure. I think if a kill _did_ take place last night and was stopped somehow, then he may be the most likely explanation of claims for that. If there was no kill last night, then thats a moot point and Im thinking that probably there was no kill last night given what weve seen so far.

Also I dont think really anyone suspects Peum that much so not really tactical to vote him.
 
Peums stance on this being a 10:4 and therefore having strong investigatives is logical. I think the lack of NK suggests that the inverse is the case: maybe maf is just a weak faction compared to a normal game. Which is the assumption I was operating under.
Well he also said this on D1, do you not care about how he handled the ballot anymore?
 
Which scenario would you think is more likely? This seems to be pulling in two different directions.
2 separate ideas. Id say its proven at this point that your vote is removed. Id say its very likely your own role did it.

I mostly believe your role claim but your role could be a town or maf role reasonably. If i take your word, It definitely sounds like a scummy role since it removes votes and blocks investigatives. But its a plausible town role too.
 
if we are in a normal nightkill game then one of the following must have happened
- Mafia targeted me despite knowing I was planning on self-targeting
- Mafia and Pulsar targeted the same person
- the factional kill can be roleblocked (is it normal for that to happen?), Peum was the killer, and attempted to claim this for some reason
- mafia AFK'd
- some sort of arsonist or poison delayed kill type role

am I missing anything?
 
Im just trying to approach the role claim from a reasonable perspective. Peum is talking about using investigatives to confirm the roleclaim. Im just saying I dont think this role claim is likely to be fabricated nor do I think its alignmemt indicative.
 
if we are in a normal nightkill game then one of the following must have happened
- Mafia targeted me despite knowing I was planning on self-targeting
- Mafia and Pulsar targeted the same person
- the factional kill can be roleblocked (is it normal for that to happen?), Peum was the killer, and attempted to claim this for some reason
- mafia AFK'd
- some sort of arsonist or poison delayed kill type role

am I missing anything?
I think thats accurate except pulsar said she didnt target anyone last night. Mafia AFK seems unlikely but stranger things I guess.
 
Gm, just checking in before i go to work
No deaths is interesting, though i'm not 100% surprised. Like i mentioned in a previous post, i thought we might not see a traditional immediate nightkill
 
if we are in a normal nightkill game then one of the following must have happened
- Mafia targeted me despite knowing I was planning on self-targeting
- Mafia and Pulsar targeted the same person
- the factional kill can be roleblocked (is it normal for that to happen?), Peum was the killer, and attempted to claim this for some reason
- mafia AFK'd
- some sort of arsonist or poison delayed kill type role

am I missing anything?
i think all of these are less likely than a conditional nk, especially given 10:4

Man when I dont vote larry people hate me for it and when I do vote larry people hate me for it.
interesting reason to vote someone. i dont like you at all between the reasoning and 20:59 switch to lynch someone who flipped town

his content seems pretty underwhelming to me NGL but
im frankly just overwhelmed by the amount of activity in this game, not used to that at all so its been very hard to follow

random thought based on the pulsar miyami discussion: what if the twist isnt a conditional vote or anything but we just have a copious amount of protection roles?

id say the best course of action right now is to let miyami heal pulsar and bet to see if there's a lookout or tracker (idk how its called here)
i dont think we should discuss that? might as well put up a massive warning sign for the scums. also ngl i think protects should try to hit PRs rather than themselves. Protects arent helping us for shit if they dont protect our PRs.
Also, you spent all of D1 shading Larry, you haven't mentioned him once today and he's not someone you want to vote?. It reads as scum partners distancing from each other since you're not following through with pressure or a vote.
funny how youre voting for me immediately after this was said AngryPidgeon

dont really like the way realiti tries to push narratives here but my scumread on ap is pretty strong by now

##Vote: AngryPidgeon
 
Back
Top