Hax in Pokemon Battles

Status
Not open for further replies.

BlueCookies

April Fools 2009 Participant
VGC '10, '11, '12 Masters Champion
As some of you may have seen, X-Act has designed a formula that aims to prevent unfair losses due to hax. If one player haxes the other too much and wins the match, they will end up getting the loss while the other player receives the win. Now, this can be beneficial to the better players out there, such as Twist of Fate and Tay allowing them to have a slightly higher winning percentage, however to all the beginners, average, and above average players this will prevent them from reaching the next level and becoming a better player. If someone with an average rating happens to hax a player with a high rating where it may only slightly matter, the formula will take away the win from the average player when he may still have won the match without the hax. X-Act's formula doesn't even at least cause a draw if too much hax is involved. A player should never be penalized for something out of their control, like hax. Also, Hax can be considdered as skill. When you switch Tyranitar into Heatran, you know you are risking a burn and if the burn does occur, it's the users fault. The win shouldn't be given to the player who made a poor switchin. This new formula is totally outrageous. The formula has been implemented on one of Doug's private servers for testing, and it's gotten positive feedback. Enough positive feedback causing Jumpman to add it to the order of operations thread for testing next month! I would like to hear the average Smogon user's opinion on this matter, and hopefully if enough of you speak up we can prevent this from being implemented on the smogon server.
 
I honestly don't know what made you post this, and considering someone else is going to make a thread regarding this, I'm going to make my point clear. We don't need your plebeian opinions. You guys literally have no idea what you guys are talking about and if you're going to reject it on principle then you're worthless to the community in terms of progress. I'm going to leave this open for now just to see how many of you don't talk out of your ass and have something worthwhile to say. But take this as a warning - never, ever, post shit like this again - it is in PR for a reason. I'm going to make this an exception just to see if you guys are capable of responding intelligently.
 
I honestly don't know what made you post this, and considering someone else is going to make a thread regarding this, I'm going to make my point clear. We don't need your plebeian opinions. You guys literally have no idea what you guys are talking about and if you're going to reject it on principle then you're worthless to the community in terms of progress. I'm going to leave this open for now just to see how many of you don't talk out of your ass and have something worthwhile to say. But take this as a warning - never, ever, post shit like this again - it is in PR for a reason. I'm going to make this an exception just to see if you guys are capable of responding intelligently.
I don't really think I am being treated properly here, you are a moderator. You could have made your point a little more nicely. And I'm sorry, I didn't know another thread would be posted. And I think I deserve a right to post my opinion on this important matter.
 
Oh please, no one "deserves a right" to anything. If you think you deserve the right, then earn it. Judging by your stark posts it's no wonder you don't have PR access

yeah okay locking this - nothing good is going to come out of it =/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top